EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Gildan Activewear vs H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ): Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Gildan Activewear (GIL) and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) (HM-B) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: Gildan Activewear trades at $58.17 versus a fair value of $30.57 (-47%), while H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) trades at SEK 179 versus SEK 165 (-8%).
Gildan Activewear
GIL · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-47%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$58.17
Fair Value$30.57
Quality47/100
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
HM-B.ST · SEK · Consumer Discretionary
-8%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
PriceSEK 179
Fair ValueSEK 165
Quality71/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Gildan ActivewearH & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
Valuation
31.3×P/E (TTM)21.3×
2.44×P/S (TTM)1.19×
2.79×P/B6.10×
14.3×EV/EBITDA10.8×
0.50×PEG2.59×
1.8%Dividend yield4.3%
$0.93Dividend per shareSEK 7.10
Profitability
6%Net margin6%
13%Operating margin11%
11%Return on equity35%
7%Return on assets7%
Growth
64%Revenue growth (YoY)-3%
4.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.7%
13.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.1%
Balance & size
1.09×Debt / equity0.43×
$10BMarket cap$28B
healthyGrowth qualitymixed

Even match: 7 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Gildan Activewearof which business quality 49 · market factors 43 H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)of which business quality 69 · market factors 65
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
35
76
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
27
37
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
65
65
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
36
58
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
32
96
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
47
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
37
56
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
49
77
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
100
89

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Gildan Activewear

DCF Models$32.10
Earnings-Based$21.81
Dividend Discount$12.12
Multiples$40.12
Asset-Based$12.86
Growth DCF$33.08
Economic Profit$18.70
Growth Earnings$36.72

25 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

DCF ModelsSEK 250
Earnings-BasedSEK 84.94
MultiplesSEK 174
Asset-BasedSEK 20.51
Growth DCFSEK 244
Economic ProfitSEK 110
Growth EarningsSEK 149

12 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Gildan Activewear
Bear $17.10Fair Value $30.57Bull $47.12
$58.17 = current price (white tick)
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
Bear SEK 111Fair Value SEK 165Bull SEK 225
SEK 179 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Gildan Activewear · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score47 · below median
Fair value upside-47% · below median

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-8% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: Gildan Activewear trades at $58.17 versus a fair value of $30.57 (-47%), while H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) trades at SEK 179 versus SEK 165 (-8%).

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) has the higher quality score (71/100).

See the full analysis →
Gildan Activewear · H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Gildan Activewear

Amazon.com vs Toyota Motor CorporationAmazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupTesla vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

Tesla vs PDD HoldingsTesla vs Sony GroupHome Depot vs Toyota Motor CorporationHome Depot vs PDD Holdings
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.