EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Gullberg & Jansson AB vs ANTA Sports Products: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our 21 valuation models. Here is how Gullberg & Jansson AB (GJAB) and ANTA Sports Products (2020) compare, as of Aug 2, 2026.

As of Aug 2, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ANTA Sports Products as the more attractively valued of the two: Gullberg & Jansson AB trades at SEK 13.00 versus a fair value of SEK 3.21 (-75%), while ANTA Sports Products trades at HK$78.95 versus HK$119 (+51%).
Gullberg & Jansson AB
GJAB.ST · SEK · Materials
-75%
above fair value
overvalued
PriceSEK 13.00
Fair ValueSEK 3.21
Quality54/100
ANTA Sports Products
2020.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
+51%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$78.95
Fair ValueHK$119
Quality58/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Gullberg & Jansson ABANTA Sports Products
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)13.4×
0.05×P/S (TTM)2.56×
0.10×P/B3.20×
—EV/EBITDA10.0×
—PEG1.74×
—Dividend yield3.0%
—Dividend per shareHK$2.20
Profitability
-4%Net margin17%
-19%Operating margin21%
-9%Return on equity23%
-2%Return on assets10%
Growth
-21%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
-10.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)14.3%
—Avg. growth/yr (5Y)17.7%
Balance & size
0.14×Debt / equity0.18×
$12MMarket cap$26B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

ANTA Sports Products leads: 3 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Gullberg & Jansson ABof which business quality 65 · market factors 42 ANTA Sports Productsof which business quality 66 · market factors 45
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
30
66
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
62
38
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
62
83
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
73
78
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
31
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
53
82
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
38
31
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
38
26
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
75

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Gullberg & Jansson AB

DCF ModelsSEK 9.95
Dividend DiscountSEK 4.95
MultiplesSEK 8.12
Asset-BasedSEK 3.21
Growth DCFSEK 11.15

11 of 12 models see the stock below the current price.

ANTA Sports Products

DCF ModelsHK$178
Earnings-BasedHK$104
Dividend DiscountHK$44.23
MultiplesHK$85.43
Asset-BasedHK$15.51
Growth DCFHK$171
Economic ProfitHK$68.45
Growth EarningsHK$137

8 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Gullberg & Jansson AB
Bear SEK 2.17Fair Value SEK 3.21Bull SEK 4.02
SEK 13.00 = current price (white tick)
ANTA Sports Products
Bear HK$87.61Fair Value HK$119Bull HK$215
HK$78.95 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Gullberg & Jansson AB · Materials

Quality score54 · above median
Fair value upside-75% · bottom 25%

ANTA Sports Products · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score58 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+51% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 2, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ANTA Sports Products as the more attractively valued of the two: Gullberg & Jansson AB trades at SEK 13.00 versus a fair value of SEK 3.21 (-75%), while ANTA Sports Products trades at HK$78.95 versus HK$119 (+51%).

ANTA Sports Products has the higher quality score (58/100).

See the full analysis →
Gullberg & Jansson AB · ANTA Sports Products

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Gullberg & Jansson AB

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to ANTA Sports Products

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupTesla vs Toyota Motor CorporationTesla vs PDD Holdings
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.