EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

iVision Tech S.p.A. vs Nike: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how iVision Tech S.p.A. (IVN) and Nike (NKE) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Nike as the more attractively valued of the two: iVision Tech S.p.A. trades at €1.29 versus a fair value of €0.15 (-88%), while Nike trades at $42.00 versus $53.45 (+27%).
iVision Tech S.p.A.
IVN.MI · EUR · Materials
-88%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€1.29
Fair Value€0.15
Quality27/100
Nike
NKE · USD · Consumer Discretionary
+27%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$42.00
Fair Value$53.45
Quality61/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

iVision Tech S.p.A.Nike
Valuation
P/E (TTM)20.4×
0.77×P/S (TTM)1.37×
1.58×P/B4.26×
7.5×EV/EBITDA14.1×
PEG1.69×
Dividend yield3.8%
Dividend per share$1.63
Profitability
0%Net margin7%
-0%Operating margin12%
0%Return on equity22%
1%Return on assets6%
Growth
-9%Revenue growth (YoY)-1%
34.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-3.2%
Avg. growth/yr (5Y)0.8%
Balance & size
0.72×Debt / equity0.54×
$16MMarket cap$63B
expensiveGrowth qualityweak

Nike leads: 4 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

iVision Tech S.p.A.of which business quality 39 · market factors 13 Nikeof which business quality 70 · market factors 23
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
33
70
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
88
34
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
37
56
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
24
78
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
5
95
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
32
52
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
9
16
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
3
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
51
92

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

iVision Tech S.p.A.

Earnings-Based€0.15
Multiples€0.70
Asset-Based€0.85
Economic Profit€0.48
Growth Earnings€0.16

11 of 14 models see the stock below the current price.

Nike

DCF Models$39.59
Earnings-Based$18.25
Dividend Discount$26.69
Multiples$37.88
Asset-Based$6.72
Growth DCF$37.37
Economic Profit$20.91
Growth Earnings$37.60

21 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

iVision Tech S.p.A.
Bear €0.11Fair Value €0.15Bull €0.20
€1.29 = current price (white tick)
Nike
Bear $36.23Fair Value $53.45Bull $66.82
$42.00 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

iVision Tech S.p.A. · Materials

Quality score27 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-88% · bottom 25%

Nike · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score61 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+27% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Nike as the more attractively valued of the two: iVision Tech S.p.A. trades at €1.29 versus a fair value of €0.15 (-88%), while Nike trades at $42.00 versus $53.45 (+27%).

Nike has the higher quality score (61/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.