Metro Holdings vs Falabella S.A: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Metro Holdings (M01) and Falabella S.A (FALABELLA) compare, as of Aug 19, 2026.
As of Aug 19, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Falabella S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Metro Holdings trades at S$0.42 versus a fair value of S$0.32 (-24%), while Falabella S.A trades at CLP 6,314 versus CLP 8,005 (+27%).
Metro Holdings
M01.SG · SGD · Consumer Discretionary
-24%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceS$0.42
Fair ValueS$0.32
Quality57/100
Falabella S.A
FALABELLA.SN · CLP · Consumer Discretionary
+27%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceCLP 6,314
Fair ValueCLP 8,005
Quality57/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Metro HoldingsFalabella S.A
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)11.4×
3.12×P/S (TTM)1.11×
0.33×P/B1.88×
—EV/EBITDA7.4×
2.53×PEG1.03×
4.4%Dividend yield2.3%
S$0.02Dividend per share—
Profitability
—Net margin10%
-28%Operating margin13%
-19%Return on equity22%
-1%Return on assets4%
Growth
-1%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
-5.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.7%
0.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.0%
Balance & size
0.35×Debt / equity0.06×
$305MMarket cap$16B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Falabella S.A leads: 2 to 9 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Metro Holdingsof which business quality 59 · market factors 42Falabella S.Aof which business quality 54 · market factors 65
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
0
44
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
44
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
98
68
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
84
79
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
27
53
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
21
69
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
81
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Metro Holdings
DCF ModelsS$0.31
MultiplesS$0.24
Asset-BasedS$0.75
Growth DCFS$0.34
6 of 7 models see the stock below the current price.
Falabella S.A
DCF ModelsCLP 8,510
Earnings-BasedCLP 5,125
MultiplesCLP 8,613
Asset-BasedCLP 2,129
Growth DCFCLP 8,036
Economic ProfitCLP 6,423
Growth EarningsCLP 10,208
4 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Metro Holdings
Bear S$0.29Fair Value S$0.32Bull S$0.32
S$0.42 = current price (white tick)
Falabella S.A
Bear CLP 5,604Fair Value CLP 8,005Bull CLP 11,780
CLP 6,314 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Metro Holdings · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside-24% · below median
Falabella S.A · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside+27% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 19, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Falabella S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Metro Holdings trades at S$0.42 versus a fair value of S$0.32 (-24%), while Falabella S.A trades at CLP 6,314 versus CLP 8,005 (+27%).
Metro Holdings has the higher quality score (57/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
