Mayfield Group Holdings vs Cisco Systems: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Mayfield Group Holdings (MYG) and Cisco Systems (CSCO) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Mayfield Group Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Mayfield Group Holdings trades at A$2.10 versus a fair value of A$1.16 (-45%), while Cisco Systems trades at $121 versus $56.19 (-54%).
Mayfield Group Holdings
MYG.AU · AUD · Information Technology
-45%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$2.10
Fair ValueA$1.16
Quality69/100
Cisco Systems
CSCO · USD · Information Technology
-54%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$121
Fair Value$56.19
Quality74/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Mayfield Group HoldingsCisco Systems
Valuation
28.1×P/E (TTM)40.4×
1.43×P/S (TTM)7.87×
5.99×P/B10.21×
12.9×EV/EBITDA29.0×
—PEG1.68×
1.5%Dividend yield1.4%
A$0.04Dividend per share$1.65
Profitability
6%Net margin20%
9%Operating margin25%
17%Return on equity25%
11%Return on assets7%
Growth
53%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
12.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.2%
14.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)2.8%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.49×
$208MMarket cap$478B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
Mayfield Group Holdings leads: 9 to 3 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Mayfield Group Holdingsof which business quality 71 · market factors 49Cisco Systemsof which business quality 70 · market factors 84
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
74
58
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
84
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
47
75
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
34
61
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
45
95
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
72
94
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
58
97
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Mayfield Group Holdings
DCF ModelsA$2.15
Earnings-BasedA$2.04
MultiplesA$1.56
Asset-BasedA$0.20
Growth DCFA$2.05
Economic ProfitA$0.87
Growth EarningsA$2.62
15 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Cisco Systems
DCF Models$56.75
Earnings-Based$25.45
Dividend Discount$31.20
Multiples$40.16
Asset-Based$7.96
Growth DCF$56.88
Economic Profit$28.50
Growth Earnings$40.89
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Mayfield Group Holdings
Bear A$0.87Fair Value A$1.16Bull A$1.45
A$2.10 = current price (white tick)
Cisco Systems
Bear $40.50Fair Value $56.19Bull $71.87
$121 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Mayfield Group Holdings · Information Technology
Quality score69 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-45% · below median
Cisco Systems · Information Technology
Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-54% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Mayfield Group Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Mayfield Group Holdings trades at A$2.10 versus a fair value of A$1.16 (-45%), while Cisco Systems trades at $121 versus $56.19 (-54%).
Cisco Systems has the higher quality score (74/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
