Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Muza S.A (MZA) and New York Times (NYT) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees New York Times as the less overvalued of the two: Muza S.A trades at PLN 8.90 versus a fair value of PLN 3.13 (-65%), while New York Times trades at $63.54 versus $41.95 (-34%).
Muza S.A
MZA.WAR · PLN · Communication Services
-65%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PricePLN 8.90
Fair ValuePLN 3.13
Quality44/100
New York Times
NYT · USD · Communication Services
-34%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$63.54
Fair Value$41.95
Quality79/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Muza S.ANew York Times
Valuation
9.1×P/E (TTM)32.3×
0.18×P/S (TTM)4.24×
0.16×P/B5.96×
—EV/EBITDA22.3×
—PEG3.79×
—Dividend yield1.1%
—Dividend per share$0.77
Profitability
7%Net margin13%
8%Operating margin13%
7%Return on equity20%
2%Return on assets10%
Growth
10%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
1.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)7.0%
8.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
Balance & size
$8MMarket cap$12B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
New York Times leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Muza S.Aof which business quality 47 · market factors 38New York Timesof which business quality 77 · market factors 48
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
39
69
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
13
60
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
32
76
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
72
62
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
30
41
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
12
46
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
94
87
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Muza S.A
DCF ModelsPLN 6.45
Earnings-BasedPLN 8.04
Dividend DiscountPLN 5.37
MultiplesPLN 13.78
Asset-BasedPLN 9.62
Economic ProfitPLN 8.08
Growth EarningsPLN 13.56
5 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.
New York Times
DCF Models$43.20
Earnings-Based$25.06
Dividend Discount$8.21
Multiples$40.11
Asset-Based$8.49
Growth DCF$45.30
Economic Profit$22.32
Growth Earnings$35.48
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Muza S.A
Bear PLN 2.58Fair Value PLN 3.13Bull PLN 4.07
PLN 8.90 = current price (white tick)
New York Times
Bear $31.78Fair Value $41.95Bull $52.11
$63.54 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Muza S.A · Communication Services
Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside-65% · bottom 25%
New York Times · Communication Services
Quality score79 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-34% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees New York Times as the less overvalued of the two: Muza S.A trades at PLN 8.90 versus a fair value of PLN 3.13 (-65%), while New York Times trades at $63.54 versus $41.95 (-34%).
New York Times has the higher quality score (79/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
