EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Procter & Gamble vs Hangzhou Electn Soul Network: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Procter & Gamble (PG) and Hangzhou Electn Soul Network (603258) compare, as of Aug 5, 2026.

As of Aug 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Procter & Gamble as the less overvalued of the two: Procter & Gamble trades at $148 versus a fair value of $110 (-26%), while Hangzhou Electn Soul Network trades at ¥13.46 versus ¥4.73 (-65%).
Procter & Gamble
PG · USD · Consumer Staples
-26%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$148
Fair Value$110
Quality70/100
Hangzhou Electn Soul Network
603258.SHG · CNY · Communication Services
-65%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥13.46
Fair Value¥4.73
Quality39/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Procter & GambleHangzhou Electn Soul Network
Valuation
21.5×P/E (TTM)
3.95×P/S (TTM)1.28×
6.58×P/B0.24×
14.3×EV/EBITDA
4.13×PEG
2.9%Dividend yield
$4.23Dividend per share
Profitability
19%Net margin-64%
23%Operating margin-27%
31%Return on equity-12%
11%Return on assets-2%
Growth
7%Revenue growth (YoY)-12%
1.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-21.3%
3.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-17.8%
Balance & size
0.48×Debt / equity
$342BMarket cap$476M
healthyGrowth qualityweak

Procter & Gamble leads: 7 to 2 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Procter & Gambleof which business quality 71 · market factors 55 Hangzhou Electn Soul Networkof which business quality 47 · market factors 27
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
73
4
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
20
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
65
0
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
70
100
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
85
96
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
95
80
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
40
7
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
37
2
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
91
91

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Procter & Gamble

DCF Models$97.73
Earnings-Based$85.21
Dividend Discount$59.55
Multiples$107
Asset-Based$14.97
Growth DCF$87.37
Economic Profit$68.20
Growth Earnings$107

23 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Hangzhou Electn Soul Network

Dividend Discount¥4.48
Asset-Based¥5.46

3 of 3 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Procter & Gamble
Bear $71.82Fair Value $110Bull $151
$148 = current price (white tick)
Hangzhou Electn Soul Network
Bear ¥4.29Fair Value ¥4.73Bull ¥5.41
¥13.46 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Procter & Gamble · Consumer Staples

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-26% · below median

Hangzhou Electn Soul Network · Communication Services

Quality score39 · below median
Fair value upside-65% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Procter & Gamble as the less overvalued of the two: Procter & Gamble trades at $148 versus a fair value of $110 (-26%), while Hangzhou Electn Soul Network trades at ¥13.46 versus ¥4.73 (-65%).

Procter & Gamble has the higher quality score (70/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.