QBNK Holding AB vs Microsoft: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how QBNK Holding AB (QBNK) and Microsoft (MSFT) compare, as of Aug 30, 2026.
As of Aug 30, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Microsoft as the less overvalued of the two: QBNK Holding AB trades at SEK 6.85 versus a fair value of SEK 3.55 (-48%), while Microsoft trades at $514 versus $381 (-26%).
QBNK Holding AB
QBNK.ST · SEK · Real Estate
-48%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSEK 6.85
Fair ValueSEK 3.55
Quality62/100
Microsoft
MSFT · USD · Information Technology
-26%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$514
Fair Value$381
Quality66/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
QBNK Holding ABMicrosoft
Valuation
114.2×P/E (TTM)22.9×
1.72×P/S (TTM)8.99×
12.87×P/B8.33×
—EV/EBITDA15.6×
—PEG1.19×
—Dividend yield0.7%
—Dividend per share$3.56
Profitability
1%Net margin39%
-3%Operating margin46%
11%Return on equity34%
1%Return on assets15%
Growth
-0%Revenue growth (YoY)18%
6.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)12.4%
—Avg. growth/yr (5Y)14.5%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.12×
$7MMarket cap$2.9T
expensiveGrowth qualityexpensive
Microsoft leads: 1 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
QBNK Holding ABof which business quality 60 · market factors 35Microsoftof which business quality 65 · market factors 56
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
38
75
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
66
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
1
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
36
57
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
37
55
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
32
59
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
84
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
QBNK Holding AB
MultiplesSEK 1.15
Asset-BasedSEK 0.37
Economic ProfitSEK 0.35
6 of 6 models see the stock below the current price.
Microsoft
DCF Models$333
Earnings-Based$189
Dividend Discount$61.93
Multiples$308
Asset-Based$30.98
Growth DCF$249
Economic Profit$184
Growth Earnings$332
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
QBNK Holding AB
Bear SEK 2.69Fair Value SEK 3.55Bull SEK 4.41
SEK 6.85 = current price (white tick)
Microsoft
Bear $192Fair Value $381Bull $480
$514 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
QBNK Holding AB · Real Estate
Quality score62 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-48% · bottom 25%
Microsoft · Information Technology
Quality score66 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-26% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 30, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Microsoft as the less overvalued of the two: QBNK Holding AB trades at SEK 6.85 versus a fair value of SEK 3.55 (-48%), while Microsoft trades at $514 versus $381 (-26%).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
