STOCK COMPARISON
Qualys vs Microsoft: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Qualys (QLYS) and Microsoft (MSFT) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Microsoft as the less overvalued of the two: Qualys trades at $183 versus a fair value of $91.63 (-50%), while Microsoft trades at $500 versus $274 (-45%).
Qualys
QLYS · USD · Information Technology
-50%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$183
Fair Value$91.63
Quality83/100
Microsoft
MSFT · USD · Information Technology
-45%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$500
Fair Value$274
Quality68/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
QualysMicrosoft
Valuation
27.5×P/E (TTM)22.9×
7.85×P/S (TTM)8.99×
9.58×P/B8.33×
20.9×EV/EBITDA15.6×
6.00×PEG1.19×
—Dividend yield0.9%
—Dividend per share$3.56
Profitability
29%Net margin39%
35%Operating margin46%
38%Return on equity34%
14%Return on assets15%
Growth
10%Revenue growth (YoY)18%
11.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)12.4%
13.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)14.5%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.12×
$5BMarket cap$2.9T
healthyGrowth qualityexpensive
Microsoft leads: 2 to 10 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Qualysof which business quality 82 · market factors 75
Microsoftof which business quality 65 · market factors 51
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
86
75
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
62
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
93
71
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
90
79
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
40
1
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
55
57
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
82
48
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
86
51
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
100
84
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Qualys
DCF Models$153
Earnings-Based$82.56
Dividend Discount$23.16
Multiples$74.50
Asset-Based$10.68
Growth DCF$154
Economic Profit$64.28
Growth Earnings$118
23 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Microsoft
DCF Models$289
Earnings-Based$189
Dividend Discount$61.93
Multiples$206
Asset-Based$30.98
Growth DCF$201
Economic Profit$184
Growth Earnings$276
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Qualys
Bear $69.81Fair Value $91.63Bull $153
$183 = current price (white tick)
Microsoft
Bear $159Fair Value $274Bull $358
$500 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Qualys · Information Technology
Quality score83 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-50% · below median
Microsoft · Information Technology
Quality score68 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-45% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Microsoft as the less overvalued of the two: Qualys trades at $183 versus a fair value of $91.63 (-50%), while Microsoft trades at $500 versus $274 (-45%).
Qualys has the higher quality score (83/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
