PT Raharja Energi Cepu Tbk vs Cnooc: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how PT Raharja Energi Cepu Tbk (RATU) and Cnooc (0883) compare, as of Aug 27, 2026.
As of Aug 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cnooc as the more attractively valued of the two: PT Raharja Energi Cepu Tbk trades at IDR 4,200 versus a fair value of IDR 752 (-82%), while Cnooc trades at HK$24.92 versus HK$26.54 (+7%).
PT Raharja Energi Cepu Tbk
RATU.JK · IDR · Energy
-82%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceIDR 4,200
Fair ValueIDR 752
Quality72/100
Cnooc
0883.HK · HKD · Energy
+7%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
PriceHK$24.92
Fair ValueHK$26.54
Quality63/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
PT Raharja Energi Cepu TbkCnooc
Valuation
58.5×P/E (TTM)7.7×
25.03×P/S (TTM)2.67×
23.98×P/B1.35×
54.3×EV/EBITDA4.3×
—PEG0.16×
—Dividend yield4.6%
—Dividend per shareHK$1.15
Profitability
28%Net margin31%
51%Operating margin45%
25%Return on equity15%
13%Return on assets9%
Growth
-17%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
—Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-3.7%
—Avg. growth/yr (5Y)20.0%
Balance & size
0.19×Debt / equity0.07×
$1BMarket cap$139B
mixedGrowth qualityexpensive
Cnooc leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
PT Raharja Energi Cepu Tbkof which business quality 73 · market factors 6Cnoocof which business quality 64 · market factors 64
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
80
55
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
25
36
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
40
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
0
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
12
50
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
3
68
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
84
79
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
PT Raharja Energi Cepu Tbk
DCF ModelsIDR 1,354
Earnings-BasedIDR 978
Dividend DiscountIDR 451
MultiplesIDR 451
Asset-BasedIDR 150
Growth DCFIDR 1,279
Economic ProfitIDR 978
Growth EarningsIDR 903
20 of 20 models see the stock below the current price.
Cnooc
DCF ModelsHK$41.36
Earnings-BasedHK$27.87
Dividend DiscountHK$25.25
MultiplesHK$33.44
Asset-BasedHK$12.08
Growth DCFHK$33.29
Economic ProfitHK$32.53
Growth EarningsHK$33.61
10 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
PT Raharja Energi Cepu Tbk
Bear IDR 564Fair Value IDR 752Bull IDR 1,242
IDR 4,200 = current price (white tick)
Cnooc
Bear HK$19.94Fair Value HK$26.54Bull HK$33.98
HK$24.92 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
PT Raharja Energi Cepu Tbk · Energy
Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-82% · bottom 25%
Cnooc · Energy
Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+7% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cnooc as the more attractively valued of the two: PT Raharja Energi Cepu Tbk trades at IDR 4,200 versus a fair value of IDR 752 (-82%), while Cnooc trades at HK$24.92 versus HK$26.54 (+7%).
PT Raharja Energi Cepu Tbk has the higher quality score (72/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
