Rubicon Technology vs ASML Holding: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Rubicon Technology (RBCN) and ASML Holding (ASML) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ASML Holding as the less overvalued of the two: Rubicon Technology trades at $5.80 versus a fair value of $1.43 (-75%), while ASML Holding trades at €1,514 versus €444 (-71%).
Rubicon Technology
RBCN · USD · Information Technology
-75%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$5.80
Fair Value$1.43
Quality35/100
ASML Holding
ASML.AS · EUR · Information Technology
-71%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€1,514
Fair Value€444
Quality82/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Rubicon TechnologyASML Holding
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)60.6×
14.85×P/S (TTM)19.31×
—P/B34.78×
—EV/EBITDA49.8×
1.84×PEG2.19×
—Dividend yield0.3%
—Dividend per share€5.90
Profitability
26%Net margin30%
-4%Operating margin37%
6%Return on equity54%
-4%Return on assets16%
Growth
-21%Revenue growth (YoY)21%
128.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)15.6%
63.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)18.5%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.14×
$53MMarket cap$682B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
ASML Holding leads: 4 to 5 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Rubicon Technologyof which business quality 36 · market factors 70ASML Holdingof which business quality 79 · market factors 70
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
24
81
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
60
77
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
67
42
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
0
35
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
100
81
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
90
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
92
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Rubicon Technology
Earnings-Based$6.99
Multiples$3.39
Economic Profit$1.91
Growth Earnings$9.00
7 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.
ASML Holding
DCF Models€708
Earnings-Based€393
Dividend Discount€127
Multiples€342
Asset-Based€34.21
Growth DCF€664
Economic Profit€376
Growth Earnings€570
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Rubicon Technology
Bear $1.43Fair Value $1.43Bull $1.77
$5.80 = current price (white tick)
ASML Holding
Bear €339Fair Value €444Bull €740
€1,514 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Rubicon Technology · Information Technology
Quality score35 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-75% · bottom 25%
ASML Holding · Information Technology
Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-71% · bottom 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ASML Holding as the less overvalued of the two: Rubicon Technology trades at $5.80 versus a fair value of $1.43 (-75%), while ASML Holding trades at €1,514 versus €444 (-71%).
ASML Holding has the higher quality score (82/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
