STOCK COMPARISON
Sfdmy vs Nvidia: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Sfdmy (SFDMY) and Nvidia (NVDA) compare, as of Aug 6, 2026.
As of Aug 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sfdmy as the less overvalued of the two: Sfdmy trades at $49.75 versus a fair value of $23.87 (-52%), while Nvidia trades at $219 versus $96.91 (-56%).
Sfdmy
SFDMY · USD · Information Technology
-52%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$49.75
Fair Value$23.87
Quality64/100
Nvidia
NVDA · USD · Information Technology
-56%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$219
Fair Value$96.91
Quality68/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
SfdmyNvidia
Valuation
11.2×P/E (TTM)32.3×
—P/S (TTM)20.16×
—P/B32.48×
—EV/EBITDA30.9×
—PEG0.65×
0.7%Dividend yield0.0%
$0.06Dividend per share$0.04
Profitability
31%Net margin63%
32%Operating margin66%
26%Return on equity114%
13%Return on assets53%
Growth
12%Revenue growth (YoY)85%
4.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)100.0%
18.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)66.9%
Balance & size
0.10×Debt / equity0.05×
$1BMarket cap$5.1T
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Nvidia leads: 2 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Sfdmyof which business quality 57 · market factors 65
Nvidiaof which business quality 74 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
32
96
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
37
34
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
71
81
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
65
83
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
49
32
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
100
26
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
41
55
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
67
68
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
90
91
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Sfdmy
DCF Models$41.96
Earnings-Based$21.41
Dividend Discount$7.90
Multiples$22.71
Asset-Based$23.63
Growth DCF$49.21
Economic Profit$18.63
Growth Earnings$30.81
23 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Nvidia
DCF Models$128
Earnings-Based$148
Dividend Discount$0.77
Multiples$47.03
Asset-Based$4.35
Growth DCF$92.69
Economic Profit$106
Growth Earnings$179
25 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Sfdmy
Bear $20.40Fair Value $23.87Bull $26.84
$49.75 = current price (white tick)
Nvidia
Bear $53.60Fair Value $96.91Bull $178
$219 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Sfdmy · Information Technology
Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-52% · below median
Nvidia · Information Technology
Quality score68 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-56% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sfdmy as the less overvalued of the two: Sfdmy trades at $49.75 versus a fair value of $23.87 (-52%), while Nvidia trades at $219 versus $96.91 (-56%).
Nvidia has the higher quality score (68/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
