XRF Scientific vs Citic Pacific: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how XRF Scientific (XRF) and Citic Pacific (0267) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: XRF Scientific trades at A$1.84 versus a fair value of A$1.23 (-33%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$12.04 versus HK$22.56 (+87%).
XRF Scientific
XRF.AU · AUD · Industrials
-33%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$1.84
Fair ValueA$1.23
Quality69/100
Citic Pacific
0267.HK · HKD · Industrials
+87%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$12.04
Fair ValueHK$22.56
Quality45/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
XRF ScientificCitic Pacific
Valuation
21.0×P/E (TTM)4.8×
2.74×P/S (TTM)0.34×
2.82×P/B0.37×
9.8×EV/EBITDA2.8×
—PEG1.76×
2.6%Dividend yield5.2%
A$0.05Dividend per shareHK$0.59
Profitability
17%Net margin6%
24%Operating margin30%
18%Return on equity8%
14%Return on assets1%
Growth
9%Revenue growth (YoY)-2%
14.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.2%
15.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.9%
Balance & size
0.02×Debt / equity2.03×
$170MMarket cap$41B
mixedGrowth qualityexpensive
XRF Scientific leads: 7 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
XRF Scientificof which business quality 68 · market factors 41Citic Pacificof which business quality 39 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
70
20
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
50
54
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
64
69
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
67
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
30
35
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
29
48
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
67
82
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
XRF Scientific
DCF ModelsA$1.22
Earnings-BasedA$1.37
MultiplesA$1.38
Asset-BasedA$0.28
Growth DCFA$0.88
Economic ProfitA$0.50
10 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.
Citic Pacific
DCF ModelsHK$25.60
Earnings-BasedHK$65.33
Dividend DiscountHK$11.60
MultiplesHK$41.60
Asset-BasedHK$20.07
Economic ProfitHK$26.48
1 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
XRF Scientific
Bear A$0.93Fair Value A$1.23Bull A$1.54
A$1.84 = current price (white tick)
Citic Pacific
Bear HK$16.92Fair Value HK$22.56Bull HK$28.20
HK$12.04 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
XRF Scientific · Industrials
Quality score69 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-33% · below median
Citic Pacific · Industrials
Quality score45 · below median
Fair value upside+87% · Top 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: XRF Scientific trades at A$1.84 versus a fair value of A$1.23 (-33%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$12.04 versus HK$22.56 (+87%).
XRF Scientific has the higher quality score (69/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
