Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

0169 (0169) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$493M

0 0169 0169 · HK
PriceHK$0.1050
Fair ValueHK$0.0700
Upside-33.3%
Quality56/100
Evidence: Medium Range HK$0.0492 – HK$0.0748

Fair value as of: Jul 1, 2026

From 25 valuation models · updated today

Share price −11.0% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.7500 HK$0.0830 Fair Value HK$0.0700 Jun 2025 Jun 2026

12‑month range HK$0.0830 – HK$0.7500 · fair‑value band HK$0.0492 – HK$0.0748 · the HK$0.1050 price screens above the HK$0.0700 fair value. As of Jul 1, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

0169 (0169) currently trades at HK$0.1050, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0700 — implying the stock looks roughly 33.3% overvalued today. We read business quality at 56/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).

Trailing-twelve-month revenue stands at HK$118M. Revenue grew 16.1% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -3.1%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$511M. Fundamentals as of Jul 1, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$118M
Revenue growth (YoY) +16.1%
Net margin 1,511%
Return on equity -3.1%
Free cash flow HK$288M FY2025
Operating margin -22.7%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0100
EPS growth (YoY) -80.6%
Net cash HK$511M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 1, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

0169 reported revenue of HK$118M in FY2025 versus HK$873M in FY2021, a compound −39.4%/yr. Reported net income was HK$1.8B in FY2025, compounding +66.2%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −39.4%/yr
FY21 HK$873M
FY22 HK$819M
FY23 HK$983M
FY24 HK$991M
FY25 HK$118M
Net income +66.2%/yr
FY21 HK$233M
FY22 HK$193M
FY23 HK$165M
FY24 −HK$591M
FY25 HK$1.8B

Is 0169 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Resorts & Casinos stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 1, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Las Vegas Sands Corp LVS $50.25 $40.05 -20%
Galaxy Entertainment Group GXYEF $3.78 $6.82 +81%
0027 0027 HK$29.42 HK$41.44 +41%
Sands China Ltd SCHYF $1.80 $2.18 +21%
MGM Resorts International, through its subsidiaries, MGM $46.91 $20.81 -56%
Wynn Resorts, Limited WYNN $105.26 $28.17 -73%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 0169 (0169) undervalued?
As of Jul 1, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0700 versus a price of HK$0.1050 — about −33% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 0169?
Our model-based fair value for 0169 is HK$0.0700 (as of Jul 1, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1050.
What is the quality score of 0169?
0169 has a Quality Score of 56/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 0169 (0169)?
0169 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$118M (latest available figure, as of Jul 1, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.