Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

XIIlab Co (189330) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · KR · Market cap 77.1B KRW

Price8,200 KRW
Fair Value8,034 KRW
Upside-2.0%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range 6,026 KRW – 10,043 KRW

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

Analysis

XIIlab Co (189330) currently trades at 8,200 KRW, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is 8,034 KRW — implying the stock looks roughly 2.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Technology sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

XIIlab Co.,Ltd provides data-driven AI video analysis services in South Korea. It offers X-AIVA, an AI video analysis platform; Uyuni, an AI standard platform based on Kubenetes; X-Labeller, a video data processing solution; X-GEN, a synthetic data generation solution; and Vidigo, a cloud-based AI video and speech analysis service. The company was founded in 2010 and is headquartered in Seoul, South Korea.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) -42% Accenture plc (ACN) +34% Tata Consultancy Services Limited (TCS) +22% Infosys Limited (INFY) +14% Fujitsu Limited (FJTSF) +30% HCL Technologies Limited (HCLTECH) +9%

Frequently asked questions

Is XIIlab Co (189330) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of 8,034 KRW versus a price of 8,200 KRW — about −2% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 189330?
Our 21-model fair value for XIIlab Co is 8,034 KRW (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is 8,200 KRW.
What is the quality score of 189330?
XIIlab Co has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.