Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Cascadia Minerals Ltd (CAM) Fair Value & Analysis

Financial Services · CA · Market cap A$97.7M

PriceA$0.6800
Fair ValueA$0.3700
Upside-45.6%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range A$0.2800 – A$0.4600

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

Analysis

Cascadia Minerals Ltd (CAM) currently trades at A$0.6800, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.3700 — implying the stock looks roughly 45.6% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Financial Services sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

About the company

Cascadia Minerals Ltd., a junior mining company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, and evaluation of mineral properties in Canada. The company explores for copper, silver, molybdenum, and gold deposits. Its flagship property is the 100% owned Carmacks Project, covering an area of 180 square kilometers, which is located in Yukon Territory, Canada. The company was incorporated in 2023 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada. Cascadia Minerals Ltd. operates as a subsidiary of ATAC Resources Ltd.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Cascadia Minerals Ltd (CAM) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$0.3700 versus a price of A$0.6800 — about −46% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of CAM?
Our 21-model fair value for Cascadia Minerals Ltd is A$0.3700 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$0.6800.
What is the quality score of CAM?
Cascadia Minerals Ltd has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.