Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

ClearVue Technologies Limited (CPV) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · AU · Market cap A$49.2M

PriceA$0.0840
Fair ValueA$0.0218
Upside-74.0%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range A$0.0218 – A$0.0302

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

Analysis

ClearVue Technologies Limited (CPV) currently trades at A$0.0840, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.0218 — implying the stock looks roughly 74.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Technology sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

ClearVue Technologies Limited, together with its subsidiaries, provides building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) solutions in Australia. It offers solar façade, vision glass, spandrel, balustrade and skylight, and cladding and architectural BIPV, as well as greenhouse solar solutions. The company was formerly known as Tropiglas Technologies Limited and changed its name to ClearVue Technologies Limited in June 2015. ClearVue Technologies Limited was incorporated in 1995 and is headquartered in West Perth, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is ClearVue Technologies Limited (CPV) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$0.0218 versus a price of A$0.0840 — about −74% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of CPV?
Our 21-model fair value for ClearVue Technologies Limited is A$0.0218 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$0.0840.
What is the quality score of CPV?
ClearVue Technologies Limited has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.