Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

K2 Asset Management Holdings (KAM) Fair Value & Analysis

Financial Services · AU · Market cap A$13.5M

PriceA$0.0530
Fair ValueA$0.0355
Upside-33.0%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range A$0.0355 – A$0.0408

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

Analysis

K2 Asset Management Holdings (KAM) currently trades at A$0.0530, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.0355 — implying the stock looks roughly 33.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Financial Services sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

About the company

K2 Asset Management Holdings Ltd. is a publicly owned investment manager. The firm provides its services to retail, wholesale and institutional investors. It manages equity mutual funds for its clients. The firm invests in the public equity markets across the globe. K2 employs a top-down approach along with bottom-up stock picking approach. It conducts in-house research to make its investments. K2 Asset Management Holdings was founded in July 1999 and is based in Melbourne, Australia with additional office in Cottesloe, Australia, Sydney, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is K2 Asset Management Holdings (KAM) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$0.0355 versus a price of A$0.0530 — about −33% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of KAM?
Our 21-model fair value for K2 Asset Management Holdings is A$0.0355 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$0.0530.
What is the quality score of KAM?
K2 Asset Management Holdings has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.