Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Underwood Capital Limited (MMJJF) Fair Value & Analysis

Financial Services · US · Market cap $6.7M

Price$0.0330
Fair Value$0.0254
Upside-23.0%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range $0.0254 – $0.0287

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Underwood Capital Limited (MMJJF) currently trades at $0.0330, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $0.0254 — implying the stock looks roughly 23.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Financial Services sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

About the company

Underwood Capital Limited operates as a specialist investment company. The company focuses on producing capital growth for shareholders over the medium term from investments in listed and unlisted equities and debt securities. The company was formerly known as Hygrovest Limited and changed its name to Underwood Capital Limited in December 2024. Underwood Capital Limited was incorporated in 2014 and is based in Sydney, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Underwood Capital Limited (MMJJF) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of $0.0254 versus a price of $0.0330 — about −23% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of MMJJF?
Our 21-model fair value for Underwood Capital Limited is $0.0254 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is $0.0330.
What is the quality score of MMJJF?
Underwood Capital Limited has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.