Xamble Group (XGL) Fair Value & Analysis
Communication Services · AU · Market cap A$4.5M
Fair value as of: Jun 23, 2026
Analysis
Xamble Group (XGL) currently trades at A$0.0100, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.0500 — implying the stock looks roughly 400.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 80/100 (high quality), in the Communication Services sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.
About the company
Xamble Group Limited engages in the digital media business in Malaysia and Taiwan. The company engages social media influencers to promote their products and services. It also provides social media strategy and campaign management services for advertisers, as well as the involved manufacturing and construction of advertising devices across various media. In addition, the company provides automated livestream shopping experience to merchants and their customers. It operates under the nuffnang, Xamble CREATORS, Sashimi, Xamble LIVE, platapunta, and Xamble SOCIAL WALLET brands. The company was formerly known as Netccentric Limited and changed its name to Xamble Group Limited in June 2023. Xamble Group Limited was incorporated in 2006 and is based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Open the full interactive analysis →
Similar stocks
Frequently asked questions
Is Xamble Group (XGL) undervalued?
What is the fair value of XGL?
What is the quality score of XGL?
How we calculate Fair Value
Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.
Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.