STOCK COMPARISON
Lotte Shopping vs Falabella S.A: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Lotte Shopping (023530) and Falabella S.A (FALABELLA) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Falabella S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Lotte Shopping trades at KRW 99,700 versus a fair value of KRW 81,725 (-18%), while Falabella S.A trades at CLP 6,470 versus CLP 8,880 (+37%).
Lotte Shopping
023530.KO · KRW · Consumer Discretionary
-18%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 99,700
Fair ValueKRW 81,725
Quality46/100
Falabella S.A
FALABELLA.SN · CLP · Consumer Discretionary
+37%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceCLP 6,470
Fair ValueCLP 8,880
Quality57/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Lotte ShoppingFalabella S.A
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)10.7×
—P/S (TTM)1.11×
—P/B1.88×
2.8×EV/EBITDA7.4×
—PEG1.03×
2.6%Dividend yield—
KRW 4,000Dividend per share—
Profitability
1%Net margin10%
7%Operating margin13%
1%Return on equity22%
1%Return on assets4%
Growth
4%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
-3.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.7%
-3.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.0%
Balance & size
0.35×Debt / equity0.06×
$3BMarket cap$16B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Falabella S.A leads: 1 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Lotte Shoppingof which business quality 46 · market factors 60
Falabella S.Aof which business quality 54 · market factors 69
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
20
44
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
50
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
58
48
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
27
46
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
56
68
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
52
79
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
72
57
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
48
80
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
81
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Lotte Shopping
DCF ModelsKRW 170,628
Earnings-BasedKRW 27,254
Dividend DiscountKRW 78,666
MultiplesKRW 63,069
Asset-BasedKRW 359,877
Growth DCFKRW 272,131
Economic ProfitKRW 191,003
Growth EarningsKRW 30,302
13 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Falabella S.A
DCF ModelsCLP 8,510
Earnings-BasedCLP 5,125
MultiplesCLP 8,613
Asset-BasedCLP 2,129
Growth DCFCLP 8,036
Economic ProfitCLP 6,423
Growth EarningsCLP 10,208
5 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Lotte Shopping
Bear KRW 73,454Fair Value KRW 81,725Bull KRW 94,714
KRW 99,700 = current price (white tick)
Falabella S.A
Bear CLP 5,892Fair Value CLP 8,880Bull CLP 12,406
CLP 6,470 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Lotte Shopping · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score46 · below median
Fair value upside-18% · below median
Falabella S.A · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside+37% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Falabella S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Lotte Shopping trades at KRW 99,700 versus a fair value of KRW 81,725 (-18%), while Falabella S.A trades at CLP 6,470 versus CLP 8,880 (+37%).
Falabella S.A has the higher quality score (57/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
