EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Tokyo Chuo Auction Holdings vs Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Tokyo Chuo Auction Holdings (1939) and Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A (ATD) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A as the less overvalued of the two: Tokyo Chuo Auction Holdings trades at HK$0.43 versus a fair value of HK$0.21 (-51%), while Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A trades at C$91.96 versus C$75.00 (-18%).
Tokyo Chuo Auction Holdings
1939.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
-51%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.43
Fair ValueHK$0.21
Quality65/100
Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
ATD.TO · CAD · Consumer Discretionary
-18%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceC$91.96
Fair ValueC$75.00
Quality63/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Tokyo Chuo Auction HoldingsAlimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
Valuation
P/E (TTM)19.0×
0.29×P/S (TTM)0.79×
0.14×P/B3.73×
EV/EBITDA10.8×
PEG1.52×
Dividend yield0.7%
Dividend per shareC$0.61
Profitability
-17%Net margin4%
5%Operating margin9%
-8%Return on equity20%
-2%Return on assets7%
Growth
140%Revenue growth (YoY)-22%
-8.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.1%
-10.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.8%
Balance & size
0.10×Debt / equity0.64×
$31MMarket cap$60B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A leads: 4 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Tokyo Chuo Auction Holdingsof which business quality 66 · market factors 8 Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc Aof which business quality 60 · market factors 72
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
5
62
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
58
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
100
48
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
70
57
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
60
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
27
78
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
0
63
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
79
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Tokyo Chuo Auction Holdings

DCF ModelsHK$0.55
MultiplesHK$0.25
Asset-BasedHK$0.29
Growth DCFHK$0.62

2 of 7 models see the stock below the current price.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A

DCF ModelsC$84.58
Earnings-BasedC$44.54
Dividend DiscountC$10.60
MultiplesC$66.75
Asset-BasedC$11.80
Growth DCFC$76.25
Economic ProfitC$41.05
Growth EarningsC$70.03

23 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Tokyo Chuo Auction Holdings
Bear HK$0.17Fair Value HK$0.21Bull HK$0.25
HK$0.43 = current price (white tick)
Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
Bear C$44.15Fair Value C$75.00Bull C$94.14
C$91.96 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Tokyo Chuo Auction Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score65 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-51% · bottom 25%

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-18% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A as the less overvalued of the two: Tokyo Chuo Auction Holdings trades at HK$0.43 versus a fair value of HK$0.21 (-51%), while Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A trades at C$91.96 versus C$75.00 (-18%).

Tokyo Chuo Auction Holdings has the higher quality score (65/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.