EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Chu Yu Hsiang Co. vs McDonald’s: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Chu Yu Hsiang Co. (2760) and McDonald’s (MCD) compare, as of Sep 24, 2026.

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Chu Yu Hsiang Co. as the less overvalued of the two: Chu Yu Hsiang Co. trades at TWD 8.33 versus a fair value of TWD 5.98 (-28%), while McDonald’s trades at $250 versus $162 (-35%).
Chu Yu Hsiang Co.
2760.TWO · TWD · Industrials
-28%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 8.33
Fair ValueTWD 5.98
Quality30/100
McDonald’s
MCD · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-35%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$250
Fair Value$162
Quality69/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Chu Yu Hsiang Co.McDonald’s
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)20.6×
n/aP/S (TTM)7.11×
0.06×P/BNegative equity
1.4×EV/EBITDA15.8×
n/aPEG2.56×
−28.2%Fair value upside−35.2%
n/aDividend yield2.9%
n/aDividend per share$7.26
Profitability
0%Operating margin44%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.21×
n/aReturn on equityNegative equity
0%Return on assets14%
Growth
0%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
-5.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.1%
-1.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.0%
n/aValue creation/yr+11.6%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)7.8×
1.10×Debt / equityNegative equity
$5MMarket cap$195B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

McDonald’s leads: 1 to 5 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Chu Yu Hsiang Co.of which business quality 24 · market factors 15 McDonald’sof which business quality 65 · market factors 40
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
3
64
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
30
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
76
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
4
53
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
67
57
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
95
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
0
23
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
6
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
91

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyChu Yu Hsiang Co.Price TWD 8.33McDonald’sPrice $250
DCF Models-8%close to the priceTWD 7.63-45%below the price$137
Earnings-Basedn/a-59%below the price$102
Dividend Discountn/a-61%below the price$98.39
Multiples+510%above the priceTWD 50.80-10%close to the price$225
Asset-Based-45%below the priceTWD 4.60n/a
Growth DCFn/a-70%below the price$76.15
Economic Profitn/a-55%below the price$113
Growth Earningsn/a-16%below the price$209
Minimum-45%below the priceTWD 4.60-70%below the price$76.15
Maximum+510%above the priceTWD 50.80-10%close to the price$225
Median-8%close to the priceTWD 7.63-55%below the price$113
Geometric mean+46%above the priceTWD 12.13-49%below the price$128

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Chu Yu Hsiang Co.: 2 of 3 models see the stock below the current price.

McDonald’s: 19 of 21 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Chu Yu Hsiang Co.
Price TWD 8.33
Fair Value TWD 5.98
Bear TWD 4.02Bull TWD 9.08
McDonald’s
Price $250
Fair Value $162
Bear $91.48Bull $251

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Chu Yu Hsiang Co. · Industrials

Quality score30 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-28% · below median

McDonald’s · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score69 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-35% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Chu Yu Hsiang Co. as the less overvalued of the two: Chu Yu Hsiang Co. trades at TWD 8.33 versus a fair value of TWD 5.98 (-28%), while McDonald’s trades at $250 versus $162 (-35%).

McDonald’s has the higher quality score (69/100).

Open Chu Yu Hsiang Co. live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.