EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co. vs Waste Management: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co. (300948) and Waste Management (WM) compare, as of Sep 11, 2026.

As of Sep 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Waste Management as the less overvalued of the two: Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co. trades at ¥19.70 versus a fair value of ¥3.36 (-83%), while Waste Management trades at $215 versus $128 (-40%).
Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co.
300948.SHE · CNY · Industrials
-83%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥19.70
Fair Value¥3.36
Quality31/100
Waste Management
WM · USD · Industrials
-40%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$215
Fair Value$128
Quality56/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co.Waste Management
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)33.8×
3.86×P/S (TTM)3.69×
0.63×P/B9.38×
—EV/EBITDA15.1×
—PEG2.38×
−83.0%Fair value upside−40.4%
0.1%Dividend yield1.6%
—Dividend per share$3.42
Profitability
7%Operating margin18%
—EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.12×
-5%Return on equity30%
-1%Return on assets7%
Growth
1%Revenue growth (YoY)4%
-30.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.6%
-12.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.6%
—Value creation/yr+13.8%
Balance & size
—Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)5.1×
0.21×Debt / equity2.22×
$596MMarket cap$94B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Waste Management leads: 2 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co.of which business quality 31 · market factors 48 Waste Managementof which business quality 54 · market factors 54
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
2
50
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
38
56
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
64
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
82
34
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
50
35
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
30
94
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
46
37
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
72
38
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
19
85

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyQingdao Greensum Ecology Co.Price ¥19.70Waste ManagementPrice $215
DCF Modelsn/a-50%below the price$108
Earnings-Basedn/a-63%below the price$80.38
Multiplesn/a-41%below the price$127
Asset-Based-80%below the price¥3.91-92%below the price$16.67
Growth DCFn/a-56%below the price$95.15
Economic Profitn/a-67%below the price$71.06
Growth Earningsn/a-40%below the price$128
Minimum-80%below the price¥3.91-92%below the price$16.67
Maximum-80%below the price¥3.91-40%below the price$128
Median-80%below the price¥3.91-56%below the price$95.15
Geometric mean-80%below the price¥3.91-64%below the price$76.95

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co.: 1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Waste Management: 23 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co.
Bear ¥2.21Fair Value ¥3.36Bull ¥4.19
¥19.70 = current price (white tick)
Waste Management
Bear $50.10Fair Value $128Bull $177
$215 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co. · Industrials

Quality score31 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-83% · bottom 25%

Waste Management · Industrials

Quality score56 · above median
Fair value upside-40% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Waste Management as the less overvalued of the two: Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co. trades at ¥19.70 versus a fair value of ¥3.36 (-83%), while Waste Management trades at $215 versus $128 (-40%).

Waste Management has the higher quality score (56/100).

See the full analysis →
Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co. · Waste Management

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co.

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Alibaba Group Holding

Related to Waste Management

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupAmazon.com vs PDD HoldingsMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.