Xinjiang Baihuacun Co vs McDonald’s: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Xinjiang Baihuacun Co (600721) and McDonald’s (MCD) compare, as of Aug 27, 2026.
As of Aug 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees McDonald’s as the less overvalued of the two: Xinjiang Baihuacun Co trades at ¥16.68 versus a fair value of ¥1.80 (-89%), while McDonald’s trades at $267 versus $149 (-44%).
Xinjiang Baihuacun Co
600721.SHG · CNY · Materials
-89%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥16.68
Fair Value¥1.80
Quality58/100
McDonald’s
MCD · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-44%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$267
Fair Value$149
Quality69/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Xinjiang Baihuacun CoMcDonald’s
Valuation
150.6×P/E (TTM)22.1×
11.30×P/S (TTM)7.11×
5.05×P/B—
70.1×EV/EBITDA15.8×
—PEG2.56×
0.2%Dividend yield2.7%
¥0.04Dividend per share$7.26
Profitability
7%Net margin32%
14%Operating margin44%
3%Return on equity—
2%Return on assets14%
Growth
-31%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
3.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.1%
—Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.0%
Balance & size
0.04×Debt / equity—
$604MMarket cap$195B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
McDonald’s leads: 0 to 9 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Xinjiang Baihuacun Coof which business quality 57 · market factors 70McDonald’sof which business quality 65 · market factors 43
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
32
64
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
44
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
79
57
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
96
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
67
27
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
11
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
76
91
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Xinjiang Baihuacun Co
DCF Models¥2.68
Earnings-Based¥1.93
Dividend Discount¥0.01
Multiples¥2.01
Asset-Based¥1.40
Growth DCF¥2.17
Economic Profit¥1.75
Growth Earnings¥2.49
25 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
McDonald’s
DCF Models$117
Earnings-Based$102
Dividend Discount$98.39
Multiples$225
Growth DCF$58.72
Economic Profit$113
Growth Earnings$209
21 of 21 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Xinjiang Baihuacun Co
Bear ¥1.52Fair Value ¥1.80Bull ¥2.25
¥16.68 = current price (white tick)
McDonald’s
Bear $98.03Fair Value $149Bull $233
$267 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Xinjiang Baihuacun Co · Materials
Quality score58 · above median
Fair value upside-89% · bottom 25%
McDonald’s · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score69 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-44% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees McDonald’s as the less overvalued of the two: Xinjiang Baihuacun Co trades at ¥16.68 versus a fair value of ¥1.80 (-89%), while McDonald’s trades at $267 versus $149 (-44%).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
