Xinjiang Youhao Group Co vs Falabella S.A: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Xinjiang Youhao Group Co (600778) and Falabella S.A (FALABELLA) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Falabella S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Xinjiang Youhao Group Co trades at ¥5.57 versus a fair value of ¥0.93 (-83%), while Falabella S.A trades at CLP 6,470 versus CLP 8,880 (+37%).
Xinjiang Youhao Group Co
600778.SHG · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
-83%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥5.57
Fair Value¥0.93
Quality54/100
Falabella S.A
FALABELLA.SN · CLP · Consumer Discretionary
+37%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceCLP 6,470
Fair ValueCLP 8,880
Quality57/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Xinjiang Youhao Group CoFalabella S.A
Valuation
134.3×P/E (TTM)10.7×
1.21×P/S (TTM)1.11×
7.25×P/B1.88×
8.8×EV/EBITDA7.4×
0.09×PEG1.03×
Profitability
1%Net margin10%
7%Operating margin13%
2%Return on equity22%
1%Return on assets4%
Growth
-10%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
-6.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.7%
-21.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.0%
Balance & size
0.23×Debt / equity0.06×
$248MMarket cap$16B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
Falabella S.A leads: 1 to 12 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Xinjiang Youhao Group Coof which business quality 51 · market factors 32Falabella S.Aof which business quality 54 · market factors 69
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
24
44
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
50
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
68
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
73
79
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
13
57
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
19
80
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
92
81
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Xinjiang Youhao Group Co
DCF Models¥4.34
Earnings-Based¥1.35
Dividend Discount¥1.06
Multiples¥2.13
Asset-Based¥0.50
Growth DCF¥4.36
Economic Profit¥1.46
Growth Earnings¥0.71
20 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Falabella S.A
DCF ModelsCLP 8,510
Earnings-BasedCLP 5,125
MultiplesCLP 8,613
Asset-BasedCLP 2,129
Growth DCFCLP 8,036
Economic ProfitCLP 6,423
Growth EarningsCLP 10,208
5 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Xinjiang Youhao Group Co
Bear ¥0.70Fair Value ¥0.93Bull ¥1.17
¥5.57 = current price (white tick)
Falabella S.A
Bear CLP 5,892Fair Value CLP 8,880Bull CLP 12,406
CLP 6,470 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Xinjiang Youhao Group Co · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score54 · above median
Fair value upside-83% · bottom 25%
Falabella S.A · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside+37% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Falabella S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Xinjiang Youhao Group Co trades at ¥5.57 versus a fair value of ¥0.93 (-83%), while Falabella S.A trades at CLP 6,470 versus CLP 8,880 (+37%).
Falabella S.A has the higher quality score (57/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
