EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Jiangsu Broadcasting Cable inf vs Nexstar Broadcasting Group: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Jiangsu Broadcasting Cable inf (600959) and Nexstar Broadcasting Group (NXST) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Nexstar Broadcasting Group as the less overvalued of the two: Jiangsu Broadcasting Cable inf trades at ¥3.07 versus a fair value of ¥1.14 (-63%), while Nexstar Broadcasting Group trades at $194 versus $78.52 (-59%).
Jiangsu Broadcasting Cable inf
600959.SHG · CNY · Communication Services
-63%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥3.07
Fair Value¥1.14
Quality52/100
Nexstar Broadcasting Group
NXST · USD · Communication Services
-59%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$194
Fair Value$78.52
Quality53/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Jiangsu Broadcasting Cable infNexstar Broadcasting Group
Valuation
76.8×P/E (TTM)39.3×
1.96×P/S (TTM)1.11×
0.68×P/B2.74×
13.1×EV/EBITDA8.0×
PEG0.17×
0.5%Dividend yield4.1%
¥0.02Dividend per share$7.44
Profitability
3%Net margin3%
-9%Operating margin22%
1%Return on equity7%
-1%Return on assets4%
Growth
-8%Revenue growth (YoY)13%
2.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-1.7%
1.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)1.9%
Balance & size
0.05×Debt / equity3.02×
$2BMarket cap$6B
weakGrowth qualityweak

Nexstar Broadcasting Group leads: 3 to 10 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Jiangsu Broadcasting Cable infof which business quality 51 · market factors 34 Nexstar Broadcasting Groupof which business quality 50 · market factors 45
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
16
26
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
41
8
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
49
78
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
56
13
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
78
98
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
82
62
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
13
37
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
15
41
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
92
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Jiangsu Broadcasting Cable inf

DCF Models¥1.64
Earnings-Based¥0.53
Dividend Discount¥0.61
Multiples¥1.14
Asset-Based¥3.04
Growth DCF¥1.57
Economic Profit¥2.96
Growth Earnings¥0.92

20 of 22 models see the stock below the current price.

Nexstar Broadcasting Group

DCF Models$324
Earnings-Based$64.47
Dividend Discount$90.27
Multiples$126
Asset-Based$45.28
Growth DCF$367
Economic Profit$67.17
Growth Earnings$84.74

16 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Jiangsu Broadcasting Cable inf
Bear ¥0.85Fair Value ¥1.14Bull ¥1.42
¥3.07 = current price (white tick)
Nexstar Broadcasting Group
Bear $58.89Fair Value $78.52Bull $98.15
$194 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Jiangsu Broadcasting Cable inf · Communication Services

Quality score52 · below median
Fair value upside-63% · bottom 25%

Nexstar Broadcasting Group · Communication Services

Quality score53 · below median
Fair value upside-59% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Nexstar Broadcasting Group as the less overvalued of the two: Jiangsu Broadcasting Cable inf trades at ¥3.07 versus a fair value of ¥1.14 (-63%), while Nexstar Broadcasting Group trades at $194 versus $78.52 (-59%).

Nexstar Broadcasting Group has the higher quality score (53/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.