EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail vs H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ): Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail (ABFRL) and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) (HM-B) compare, as of Aug 3, 2026.

As of Aug 3, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail trades at ₹60.24 versus a fair value of ₹17.68 (-71%), while H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) trades at SEK 174 versus SEK 165 (-5%).
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail
ABFRL.NSE · INR · Consumer Discretionary
-71%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹60.24
Fair Value₹17.68
Quality25/100
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
HM-B.ST · SEK · Consumer Discretionary
-5%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
PriceSEK 174
Fair ValueSEK 165
Quality69/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Aditya Birla Fashion and RetailH & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)21.3×
—P/S (TTM)1.19×
—P/B6.10×
1.0×EV/EBITDA10.8×
—PEG2.59×
—Dividend yield4.3%
—Dividend per shareSEK 7.10
Profitability
-9%Net margin6%
-8%Operating margin11%
-13%Return on equity35%
-2%Return on assets7%
Growth
16%Revenue growth (YoY)-3%
-13.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.7%
9.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.1%
Balance & size
0.19×Debt / equity0.43×
$766MMarket cap$28B
expensiveGrowth qualitymixed

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) leads: 4 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retailof which business quality 23 · market factors 38 H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)of which business quality 69 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
10
76
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
48
37
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
5
65
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
34
58
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
57
96
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
74
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
28
50
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
14
69
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
89

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail

DCF Models₹3.37
Dividend Discount₹20.71
Multiples₹20.80
Asset-Based₹9.79

5 of 5 models see the stock below the current price.

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

DCF ModelsSEK 250
Earnings-BasedSEK 84.94
MultiplesSEK 174
Asset-BasedSEK 20.51
Growth DCFSEK 244
Economic ProfitSEK 110
Growth EarningsSEK 149

12 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail
Bear ₹3.54Fair Value ₹17.68Bull ₹32.07
₹60.24 = current price (white tick)
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
Bear SEK 111Fair Value SEK 165Bull SEK 225
SEK 174 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score25 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-71% · bottom 25%

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score69 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-5% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 3, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail trades at ₹60.24 versus a fair value of ₹17.68 (-71%), while H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) trades at SEK 174 versus SEK 165 (-5%).

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) has the higher quality score (69/100).

See the full analysis →
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail · H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail

Amazon.com vs Toyota Motor CorporationAmazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupTesla vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

Tesla vs PDD HoldingsTesla vs Sony GroupNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.