STOCK COMPARISON
Alma Media Oyj vs New York Times: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Alma Media Oyj (ALMA) and New York Times (NYT) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alma Media Oyj as the less overvalued of the two: Alma Media Oyj trades at €13.50 versus a fair value of €10.16 (-25%), while New York Times trades at $63.54 versus $41.95 (-34%).
Alma Media Oyj
ALMA.HE · EUR · Communication Services
-25%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€13.50
Fair Value€10.16
Quality72/100
New York Times
NYT · USD · Communication Services
-34%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$63.54
Fair Value$41.95
Quality79/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Alma Media OyjNew York Times
Valuation
19.2×P/E (TTM)32.3×
3.98×P/S (TTM)4.24×
5.31×P/B5.96×
14.1×EV/EBITDA22.3×
3.35×PEG3.79×
3.6%Dividend yield1.1%
€0.48Dividend per share$0.77
Profitability
18%Net margin13%
24%Operating margin13%
24%Return on equity20%
9%Return on assets10%
Growth
5%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
1.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)7.0%
7.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
Balance & size
0.50×Debt / equity—
$1BMarket cap$12B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Alma Media Oyj leads: 9 to 4 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Alma Media Oyjof which business quality 70 · market factors 52
New York Timesof which business quality 77 · market factors 48
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
62
69
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
42
60
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
87
83
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
65
85
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
86
76
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
64
62
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
47
41
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
45
46
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
78
87
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Alma Media Oyj
DCF Models€9.90
Earnings-Based€6.03
Dividend Discount€4.14
Multiples€12.21
Asset-Based€2.02
Growth DCF€9.78
Economic Profit€5.26
Growth Earnings€11.18
22 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
New York Times
DCF Models$43.20
Earnings-Based$25.06
Dividend Discount$8.21
Multiples$40.11
Asset-Based$8.49
Growth DCF$45.30
Economic Profit$22.32
Growth Earnings$35.48
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Alma Media Oyj
Bear €7.32Fair Value €10.16Bull €13.92
€13.50 = current price (white tick)
New York Times
Bear $31.78Fair Value $41.95Bull $52.11
$63.54 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Alma Media Oyj · Communication Services
Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-25% · below median
New York Times · Communication Services
Quality score79 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-34% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alma Media Oyj as the less overvalued of the two: Alma Media Oyj trades at €13.50 versus a fair value of €10.16 (-25%), while New York Times trades at $63.54 versus $41.95 (-34%).
New York Times has the higher quality score (79/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
