EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Atom Educ On vs New York Times: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Atom Educ On (ATED3) and New York Times (NYT) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees New York Times as the less overvalued of the two: Atom Educ On trades at BRL 1.48 versus a fair value of BRL 0.24 (-84%), while New York Times trades at $63.54 versus $41.95 (-34%).
Atom Educ On
ATED3.SA · BRL · Utilities
-84%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceBRL 1.48
Fair ValueBRL 0.24
Quality50/100
New York Times
NYT · USD · Communication Services
-34%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$63.54
Fair Value$41.95
Quality79/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Atom Educ OnNew York Times
Valuation
P/E (TTM)32.3×
P/S (TTM)4.24×
0.41×P/B5.96×
EV/EBITDA22.3×
PEG3.79×
Dividend yield1.1%
Dividend per share$0.77
Profitability
0%Net margin13%
0%Operating margin13%
Return on equity20%
0%Return on assets10%
Growth
0%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
-9.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)7.0%
Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
Balance & size
$7MMarket cap$12B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

New York Times leads: 1 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Atom Educ Onof which business quality 49 · market factors 12 New York Timesof which business quality 77 · market factors 48
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
38
69
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
10
60
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
6
83
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
87
85
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
76
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
24
62
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
8
41
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
4
46
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
76
87

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Atom Educ On

Asset-BasedBRL 0.53

1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

New York Times

DCF Models$43.20
Earnings-Based$25.06
Dividend Discount$8.21
Multiples$40.11
Asset-Based$8.49
Growth DCF$45.30
Economic Profit$22.32
Growth Earnings$35.48

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Atom Educ On
Bear BRL 0.16Fair Value BRL 0.24Bull BRL 0.31
BRL 1.48 = current price (white tick)
New York Times
Bear $31.78Fair Value $41.95Bull $52.11
$63.54 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Atom Educ On · Utilities

Quality score50 · above median
Fair value upside-84% · bottom 25%

New York Times · Communication Services

Quality score79 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-34% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees New York Times as the less overvalued of the two: Atom Educ On trades at BRL 1.48 versus a fair value of BRL 0.24 (-84%), while New York Times trades at $63.54 versus $41.95 (-34%).

New York Times has the higher quality score (79/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.