EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings 1997 vs GE Aerospace: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings 1997 (BSEN) and GE Aerospace (GE) compare, as of Oct 4, 2026.

As of Oct 4, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees GE Aerospace as the less overvalued of the two: Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings 1997 trades at ILS 777 versus a fair value of ILS 211 (−72.8%), while GE Aerospace trades at $310 versus $92.61 (−70.1%).
Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings 1997
BSEN.TA · ILA · Industrials
−72.8%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceILS 777
Fair ValueILS 211
Quality44/100
GE Aerospace
GE · USD · Industrials
−70.1%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$310
Fair Value$92.61
Quality73/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings 1997GE Aerospace
Valuation
42.4×P/E (TTM)36.4×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)32.0×
6.98×P/S (TTM)6.41×
8.03×P/B17.38×
32.3×EV/EBITDA28.8×
n/aPEG4.06×
−72.8%Fair value upside−70.1%
n/aDividend yield0.5%
n/aDividend per share$1.66
Profitability
17.8%Operating margin20.6%
2.30×EBIT margin trend (5Y)38.20×
20.5%Return on equity48.2%
8.6%Return on assets5.1%
Growth
18.9%Revenue growth (YoY)21.1%
27.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)n/a
19.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)n/a
+33.1%Value creation/yr+14.9%
Balance & size
8.2×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)10.4×
0.02×Debt / equity1.01×
$2BMarket cap$325B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

GE Aerospace leads: 4 to 8 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings 1997of which business quality 43 · market factors 51 GE Aerospaceof which business quality 67 · market factors 41
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
53
54
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
64
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
15
63
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
71
49
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
23
99
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
65
47
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
40
40
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
54
35
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
42
98

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyBet Shemesh Engines Holdings 1997Price ILS 777GE AerospacePrice $310
DCF Models−71.1%below the priceILS 225−64.8%below the price$109
Earnings-Based−77.8%below the priceILS 172−76.2%below the price$73.53
Dividend Discountn/a−94.8%below the price$15.99
Multiples−64.3%below the priceILS 278−66.5%below the price$104
Asset-Based−91.8%below the priceILS 63.99−96.1%below the price$12.06
Growth DCF−93.8%below the priceILS 47.93−69.1%below the price$95.67
Economic Profit−77.5%below the priceILS 175−79.1%below the price$64.61
Growth Earnings−64.6%below the priceILS 275−56.9%below the price$133
Minimum−93.8%below the priceILS 47.93−96.1%below the price$12.06
Maximum−64.3%below the priceILS 278−56.9%below the price$133
Median−77.5%below the priceILS 175−72.7%below the price$84.60
Geometric mean−80.9%below the priceILS 148−81.2%below the price$58.22

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings 1997: 23 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

GE Aerospace: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings 1997
Price ILS 777
Fair Value ILS 211
Bear ILS 119Bull ILS 357
GE Aerospace
Price $310
Fair Value $92.61
Bear $67.75Bull $138

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings 1997 · Industrials

Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside−72.8% · bottom 25%

GE Aerospace · Industrials

Quality score73 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−70.1% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Oct 4, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees GE Aerospace as the less overvalued of the two: Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings 1997 trades at ILS 777 versus a fair value of ILS 211 (−72.8%), while GE Aerospace trades at $310 versus $92.61 (−70.1%).

GE Aerospace has the higher quality score (73/100).

Open GE Aerospace live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.