EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Bt Brands vs McDonald’s: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Bt Brands (BTBD) and McDonald’s (MCD) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees McDonald’s as the less overvalued of the two: Bt Brands trades at $1.87 versus a fair value of $0.37 (-80%), while McDonald’s trades at $237 versus $163 (-31%).
Bt Brands
BTBD · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-80%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$1.87
Fair Value$0.37
Quality57/100
McDonald’s
MCD · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-31%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$237
Fair Value$163
Quality69/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Bt BrandsMcDonald’s
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)19.6×
0.87×P/S (TTM)7.11×
1.76×P/BNegative equity
39.7×EV/EBITDA15.8×
n/aPEG2.56×
−80.2%Fair value upside−31.3%
n/aDividend yield3.0%
n/aDividend per share$7.35
Profitability
-8%Operating margin44%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.21×
-18%Return on equityNegative equity
-2%Return on assets14%
Growth
-12%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
2.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.1%
10.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.0%
n/aValue creation/yr+11.7%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)7.8×
0.30×Debt / equityNegative equity
$11MMarket cap$195B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

McDonald’s leads: 2 to 6 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Bt Brandsof which business quality 56 · market factors 51 McDonald’sof which business quality 64 · market factors 40
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
32
64
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
72
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
16
76
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
62
53
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
57
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
95
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
48
23
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
58
6
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
93
88

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyBt BrandsPrice $1.87McDonald’sPrice $237
DCF Models-82%below the price$0.33-42%below the price$138
Earnings-Basedn/a-57%below the price$103
Dividend Discountn/a-58%below the price$98.79
Multiples-90%below the price$0.20-5%close to the price$226
Asset-Based-63%below the price$0.70n/a
Growth DCF-83%below the price$0.31-68%below the price$76.46
Economic Profitn/a-52%below the price$114
Growth Earningsn/a-11%close to the price$210
Minimum-90%below the price$0.20-68%below the price$76.46
Maximum-63%below the price$0.70-5%close to the price$226
Median-83%below the price$0.32-52%below the price$114
Geometric mean-82%below the price$0.34-46%below the price$128

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Bt Brands: 9 of 9 models see the stock below the current price.

McDonald’s: 19 of 21 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Bt Brands
Price $1.87
Fair Value $0.37
Bear $0.19Bull $0.64
McDonald’s
Price $237
Fair Value $163
Bear $91.85Bull $252

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Bt Brands · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside-80% · bottom 25%

McDonald’s · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score69 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-31% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees McDonald’s as the less overvalued of the two: Bt Brands trades at $1.87 versus a fair value of $0.37 (-80%), while McDonald’s trades at $237 versus $163 (-31%).

McDonald’s has the higher quality score (69/100).

Open McDonald’s live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.