EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Chandrima Mercantiles vs Sysco: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Chandrima Mercantiles (CHANDRIMA) and Sysco (SYY) compare, as of Oct 4, 2026.

As of Oct 4, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sysco as the less overvalued of the two: Chandrima Mercantiles trades at ₹11.53 versus a fair value of ₹3.06 (−73.5%), while Sysco trades at $77.49 versus $70.95 (−8.4%).
Chandrima Mercantiles
CHANDRIMA.BSE · INR · Consumer Defensive
−73.5%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹11.53
Fair Value₹3.06
Quality53/100
Sysco
SYY · USD · Consumer Staples
−8.4%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price$77.49
Fair Value$70.95
Quality59/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Chandrima MercantilesSysco
Valuation
104.8×P/E (TTM)20.9×
n/aForward P/E (FY2028)14.4×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (10 FY, ex one-offs where documented)23.6×
5.74×P/S (TTM)0.44×
4.20×P/B13.97× · book value is mostly goodwill
n/aEV/EBITDA10.6×
n/aPEG1.45×
−73.5%Fair value upside−8.4%
n/aDividend yield2.8%
n/aDividend per share$2.17
Profitability
9.2%Operating margin4.8%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.32×
5.9%Return on equity77.7%
2.6%Return on assets8.0%
Growth
-83.8%Revenue growth (YoY)4.7%
52.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.5%
40.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.5%
+92.6%Value creation/yr+30.8%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)4.3×
0.06×Debt / equity4.62×
$44MMarket cap$37B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
Sysco, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2017 to 2026), reported earnings, 4 of the years ex one-offs: 23.6.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Chandrima Mercantiles leads: 5 to 3 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Chandrima Mercantilesof which business quality 54 · market factors 77 Syscoof which business quality 57 · market factors 52
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
33
73
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
86
36
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
33
45
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
79
31
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
50
71
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
43
81
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
100
42
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
77
36
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
47
99

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyChandrima MercantilesPrice ₹11.53SyscoPrice $77.49
DCF Modelsn/a−10.9%close to the price$69.01
Earnings-Based−45.4%below the price₹6.29−61.1%below the price$30.13
Dividend Discountn/a−52.5%below the price$36.77
Multiples−73.5%below the price₹3.06−10.2%close to the price$69.61
Asset-Based−82.4%below the price₹2.03−95.2%below the price$3.72
Growth DCFn/a−12.3%close to the price$67.93
Economic Profit−84.5%below the price₹1.79−55.7%below the price$34.37
Growth Earnings−28.6%below the price₹8.23−13.2%close to the price$67.24
Minimum−84.5%below the price₹1.79−95.2%below the price$3.72
Maximum−28.6%below the price₹8.23−10.2%close to the price$69.61
Median−73.5%below the price₹3.06−32.9%below the price$52.01
Geometric mean−69.1%below the price₹3.56−53.0%below the price$36.44

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Chandrima Mercantiles: 13 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

Sysco: 21 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Chandrima Mercantiles
Price ₹11.53
Fair Value ₹3.06
Bear ₹2.29Bull ₹3.82
Sysco
Price $77.49
Fair Value $70.95
Bear $36.54Bull $96.17

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Chandrima Mercantiles · Consumer Defensive

Quality score53 · above median
Fair value upside−73.5% · bottom 25%

Sysco · Consumer Staples

Quality score59 · above median
Fair value upside−8.4% · below median

Bottom line

As of Oct 4, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sysco as the less overvalued of the two: Chandrima Mercantiles trades at ₹11.53 versus a fair value of ₹3.06 (−73.5%), while Sysco trades at $77.49 versus $70.95 (−8.4%).

Sysco has the higher quality score (59/100).

Open Sysco live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.