ConocoPhillips vs Navitas Petroleum Limited Partnership: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how ConocoPhillips (COP) and Navitas Petroleum Limited Partnership (NVPT) compare, as of Oct 5, 2026.
Head-to-head numbers
Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.
betterweakerfor reference, not scored
ConocoPhillips leads: 7 to 6 metric wins.
n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
What the models say
How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.
▲above the price, more than 15% above ●close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price ▼below the price, more than 15% below
| Model family | ConocoPhillipsPrice $127 | Navitas Petroleum Limited PartnershipPrice ILS 117 |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Models | ●+12.0%close to the price$142 | n/a |
| Earnings-Based | ▼−66.1%below the price$42.94 | ▲+34.6%above the priceILS 157 |
| Dividend Discount | ▼−56.0%below the price$55.75 | n/a |
| Multiples | ▼−30.6%below the price$87.97 | ▼−77.4%below the priceILS 26.45 |
| Asset-Based | ▼−71.6%below the price$35.97 | ▼−86.3%below the priceILS 16.04 |
| Growth DCF | ▲+27.5%above the price$162 | n/a |
| Economic Profit | ▼−56.7%below the price$54.89 | ▼−73.3%below the priceILS 31.27 |
| Growth Earnings | ▼−34.7%below the price$82.81 | ▲+57.7%above the priceILS 185 |
| Minimum | ▼−71.6%below the price$35.97 | ▼−86.3%below the priceILS 16.04 |
| Maximum | ▲+27.5%above the price$162 | ▲+57.7%above the priceILS 185 |
| Median | ▼−45.3%below the price$69.28 | ▼−73.3%below the priceILS 31.27 |
| Geometric mean | ▼−42.6%below the price$72.81 | ▼−55.4%below the priceILS 52.14 |
Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.
ConocoPhillips: 20 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Navitas Petroleum Limited Partnership: 9 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
ConocoPhillips · Energy
Navitas Petroleum Limited Partnership · Energy
Bottom line
As of Oct 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ConocoPhillips as the less overvalued of the two: ConocoPhillips trades at $127 versus a fair value of $91.42 (−27.9%), while Navitas Petroleum Limited Partnership trades at ILS 117 versus ILS 21.48 (−81.6%).
ConocoPhillips has the higher quality score (65/100).
Open ConocoPhillips live analysis →More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Related to ConocoPhillips
Alphabet Inc Class C vs NetflixAlphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs T-Mobile USAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tRelated to Navitas Petroleum Limited Partnership
Alphabet Inc Class C vs Spotify TechnologyAmazon.com vs Alibaba Group HoldingAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor CorporationAmazon.com vs Sony GroupSee the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.