EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Konami Holdings vs Vivid Games S.A: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Konami Holdings (KNM) and Vivid Games S.A (VVD) compare, as of Sep 22, 2026.

As of Sep 22, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Konami Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Konami Holdings trades at £211 versus a fair value of £65.48 (-69%), while Vivid Games S.A trades at PLN 0.60 versus PLN 0.07 (-89%).
Konami Holdings
KNM.LSE · GBP · Communication Services
-69%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price£211
Fair Value£65.48
Quality74/100
Vivid Games S.A
VVD.WAR · PLN · Communication Services
-89%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PricePLN 0.60
Fair ValuePLN 0.07
Quality20/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Konami HoldingsVivid Games S.A
Valuation
0.3×P/E (TTM)
P/S (TTM)0.56×
P/B1.78×
2.12×PEG
−68.9%Fair value upside−88.6%
1.2%Dividend yield6.9%
£222Dividend per share
Profitability
24%Operating margin-7%
2.17×EBIT margin trend (5Y)
19%Return on equity-80%
12%Return on assets-6%
Growth
27%Revenue growth (YoY)-13%
16.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-37.4%
12.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-19.7%
+26.6%Value creation/yr
Balance & size
303.6×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)
0.07×Debt / equity1.91×
$3.5TMarket cap$8M
healthyGrowth qualityweak

Konami Holdings leads: 7 to 1 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Konami Holdingsof which business quality 73 · market factors 61 Vivid Games S.Aof which business quality 23 · market factors 34
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
66
26
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
74
20
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
65
9
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
99
28
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
40
67
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
53
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
62
25
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
70
5
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
0

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyKonami HoldingsPrice £211Vivid Games S.APrice PLN 0.60
DCF Models+6692%above the price£14,300n/a
Earnings-Based+3415%above the price£7,401n/a
Dividend Discount+1469%above the price£3,304-44%below the pricePLN 0.34
Multiples+6853%above the price£14,639-87%below the pricePLN 0.08
Asset-Based+1225%above the price£2,790-90%below the pricePLN 0.06
Growth DCF+6026%above the price£12,899n/a
Economic Profit+4323%above the price£9,313n/a
Growth Earnings+6379%above the price£13,641n/a
Minimum+1225%above the price£2,790-90%below the pricePLN 0.06
Maximum+6853%above the price£14,639-44%below the pricePLN 0.34
Median+5175%above the price£11,106-87%below the pricePLN 0.08
Geometric mean+3861%above the price£8,340-80%below the pricePLN 0.12

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Konami Holdings: 0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Vivid Games S.A: 4 of 4 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Konami Holdings
Price £211
Fair Value £65.48
Bear £45.83Bull £97.39
Vivid Games S.A
Price PLN 0.60
Fair Value PLN 0.07
Bear PLN 0.03Bull PLN 0.10

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Konami Holdings · Communication Services

Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-69% · bottom 25%

Vivid Games S.A · Communication Services

Quality score20 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-89% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 22, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Konami Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Konami Holdings trades at £211 versus a fair value of £65.48 (-69%), while Vivid Games S.A trades at PLN 0.60 versus PLN 0.07 (-89%).

Konami Holdings has the higher quality score (74/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.