EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Linde vs Tanfac Industries Ltd.-$: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Linde (LIN) and Tanfac Industries Ltd.-$ (TANFACIND) compare, as of Oct 5, 2026.

As of Oct 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Linde as the less overvalued of the two: Linde trades at $479 versus a fair value of $442 (−7.9%), while Tanfac Industries Ltd.-$ trades at ₹3,259 versus ₹517 (−84.1%).
Linde
LIN · USD · Materials
−7.9%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price$479
Fair Value$442
Quality69/100
Tanfac Industries Ltd.-$
TANFACIND.BSE · INR · Basic Materials
−84.1%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹3,259
Fair Value₹517
Quality51/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

LindeTanfac Industries Ltd.-$
Valuation
31.0×P/E (TTM)96.2×
26.4×Forward P/E (FY2027)n/a
34.2×Median P/E at FY-end (10 FY, ex one-offs where documented)n/a
6.28×P/S (TTM)9.76×
5.82× · book value is mostly goodwillP/B18.89×
17.2×EV/EBITDA62.4×
1.80×PEGn/a
−7.9%Fair value upside−84.1%
1.3%Dividend yield0.1%
$6.20Dividend per share₹4.50
Profitability
28.1%Operating margin12.8%
1.84×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.78×
18.4%Return on equity20.5%
7.2%Return on assets12.4%
Growth
9.3%Revenue growth (YoY)6.3%
0.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)24.3%
4.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)37.3%
+24.2%Value creation/yr+15.1%
Balance & size
42.1×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)22.0×
0.54×Debt / equityn/a
$223BMarket cap$732M
healthyGrowth qualityexpensive
Linde, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings, 7 of the years ex one-offs: 34.2.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Linde leads: 7 to 3 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Lindeof which business quality 66 · market factors 54 Tanfac Industries Ltd.-$of which business quality 52 · market factors 80
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
51
77
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
51
34
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
64
10
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
69
80
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
70
16
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
87
68
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
36
88
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
49
80
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
95
82

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyLindePrice $479Tanfac Industries Ltd.-$Price ₹3,259
DCF Models−54.8%below the price$217−96.3%below the price₹120
Earnings-Based−72.4%below the price$132−71.7%below the price₹922
Dividend Discount−75.7%below the price$116−98.3%below the price₹55.59
Multiples−50.0%below the price$240−84.0%below the price₹523
Asset-Based−88.4%below the price$55.59−96.5%below the price₹116
Growth DCF−66.6%below the price$160n/a
Economic Profit−67.5%below the price$156−87.1%below the price₹420
Growth Earnings−57.3%below the price$205−67.3%below the price₹1,065
Minimum−88.4%below the price$55.59−98.3%below the price₹55.59
Maximum−50.0%below the price$240−67.3%below the price₹1,065
Median−67.1%below the price$158−87.1%below the price₹420
Geometric mean−69.2%below the price$148−91.1%below the price₹289

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Linde: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Tanfac Industries Ltd.-$: 17 of 17 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Linde
Price $479
Fair Value $442
Bear $247Bull $583
Tanfac Industries Ltd.-$
Price ₹3,259
Fair Value ₹517
Bear ₹388Bull ₹647

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Linde · Materials

Quality score69 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−7.9% · above median

Tanfac Industries Ltd.-$ · Basic Materials

Quality score51 · above median
Fair value upside−84.1% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Oct 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Linde as the less overvalued of the two: Linde trades at $479 versus a fair value of $442 (−7.9%), while Tanfac Industries Ltd.-$ trades at ₹3,259 versus ₹517 (−84.1%).

Linde has the higher quality score (69/100).

Open Linde live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.