EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

McDonald’s vs SIR Royalty Income Fund: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how McDonald’s (MCD) and SIR Royalty Income Fund (SRV-UN) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees McDonald’s as the less overvalued of the two: McDonald’s trades at $256 versus a fair value of $149 (-42%), while SIR Royalty Income Fund trades at C$15.26 versus C$8.60 (-44%).
McDonald’s
MCD · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-42%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$256
Fair Value$149
Quality69/100
SIR Royalty Income Fund
SRV-UN.TO · CAD · Consumer Discretionary
-44%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceC$15.26
Fair ValueC$8.60
Quality71/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

McDonald’sSIR Royalty Income Fund
Valuation
21.2×P/E (TTM)16.6×
7.11×P/S (TTM)8.52×
—P/B1.13×
15.8×EV/EBITDA8.0×
2.56×PEG—
−41.7%Fair value upside−43.6%
2.8%Dividend yield7.9%
$7.26Dividend per shareC$1.21
Profitability
44%Operating margin125%
1.21×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.13×
—Return on equity9%
14%Return on assets8%
Growth
9%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
5.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-36.4%
7.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)—
+11.5%Value creation/yr+11.8%
Balance & size
7.8×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)—
$195BMarket cap$97M
healthyGrowth qualityweak

McDonald’s leads: 6 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

McDonald’sof which business quality 65 · market factors 41 SIR Royalty Income Fundof which business quality 67 · market factors 63
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
64
46
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
76
85
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
53
60
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
57
88
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
96
100
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
24
45
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
7
53
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
91
83

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyMcDonald’sPrice $256SIR Royalty Income FundPrice C$15.26
DCF Models-54%below the price$117+22%above the priceC$18.62
Earnings-Based-60%below the price$102+32%above the priceC$20.15
Dividend Discount-62%below the price$98.39n/a
Multiples-12%close to the price$225-86%below the priceC$2.19
Asset-Basedn/a-55%below the priceC$6.91
Growth DCF-77%below the price$58.72+28%above the priceC$19.49
Economic Profit-56%below the price$113-70%below the priceC$4.56
Growth Earnings-18%below the price$209+85%above the priceC$28.16
Minimum-77%below the price$58.72-86%below the priceC$2.19
Maximum-12%close to the price$225+85%above the priceC$28.16
Median-56%below the price$113+22%above the priceC$18.62
Geometric mean-53%below the price$121-31%below the priceC$10.51

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

McDonald’s: 19 of 21 models see the stock below the current price.

SIR Royalty Income Fund: 9 of 19 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

McDonald’s
Bear $98.03Fair Value $149Bull $233
$256 = current price (white tick)
SIR Royalty Income Fund
Bear C$8.09Fair Value C$8.60Bull C$9.37
C$15.26 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

McDonald’s · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score69 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-42% · below median

SIR Royalty Income Fund · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-44% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees McDonald’s as the less overvalued of the two: McDonald’s trades at $256 versus a fair value of $149 (-42%), while SIR Royalty Income Fund trades at C$15.26 versus C$8.60 (-44%).

SIR Royalty Income Fund has the higher quality score (71/100).

See the full analysis →
McDonald’s · SIR Royalty Income Fund

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to McDonald’s

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupPDD Holdings vs TeslaSony Group vs Tesla

Related to SIR Royalty Income Fund

Home Depot vs PDD HoldingsHome Depot vs Sony GroupAlphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.