0921 (0921) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$33.7B

0 0921 0921 · HK

PriceHK$24.36

Fair ValueHK$58.43

Upside+139.9%

Quality59/100

Evidence: Medium Range HK$43.82 – HK$73.04

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated today

Share price +12.3% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$18.54 – HK$25.40 · fair‑value band HK$43.82 – HK$73.04 · the HK$24.36 price screens below the HK$58.43 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

0921 (0921) currently trades at HK$24.36, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$58.43 — implying the stock looks roughly 139.9% undervalued today. We read business quality at 59/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: medium) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 0921 generated revenue of HK$86.2B at a net margin of 3.6%. Revenue declined 7.2% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 21.1%. Net debt stands at HK$38.9M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$86.2B

Revenue growth (YoY) -7.2%

Net margin 3.6%

Return on equity 21.1%

Free cash flow HK$3.7B FY2025

P/E ratio 9.3

More key figures

Operating margin 6.9%

EPS (TTM) HK$1.58

Dividend yield 5.1%

EPS growth (YoY) -8.5%

Net debt HK$38.9M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

0921 reported revenue of HK$87.9B in FY2025 versus HK$67.6B in FY2021, a compound +6.8%/yr. Reported net income was HK$3.2B in FY2025, compounding +8.0%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +6.8%/yr

FY21 HK$67.6B

FY22 HK$74.1B

FY23 HK$85.6B

FY24 HK$92.7B

FY25 HK$87.9B

Net income +8.0%/yr

FY21 HK$2.3B

FY22 HK$3.1B

FY23 HK$2.8B

FY24 HK$3.3B

FY25 HK$3.2B

Is 0921 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Midea Group 000333	¥81.69	¥128.24	+57%
0300 0300	HK$82.60	HK$113.26	+37%
Haier Smart Home Co QIHCF	$2.42	$4.20	+74%
Gree Electric Appliances, Inc 000651	¥38.46	¥86.03	+124%
Guangdong Songfa Ceramics Co 603268	¥142.09	¥52.95	-63%
SharkNinja, Inc SN	$128.22	$78.04	-39%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 0921 (0921) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$58.43 versus a price of HK$24.36 — about +140% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 0921?

Our model-based fair value for 0921 is HK$58.43 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$24.36.

What is the quality score of 0921?

0921 has a Quality Score of 59/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 0921 (0921)?

0921 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$86.2B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 0921?

The net profit margin of 0921 is about 3.6%, meaning it keeps roughly 3.6% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 0921 pay a dividend?

0921 currently shows a dividend yield of about 5.09% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.