Check 35,000+ stocks against 26 valuation models and 37 quality factors
Data-driven stock valuation
Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free
Discover now →
LEM Holding (0QKB) fair value: what the stock is really worth
As of Oct 2, 2026: fair value of LEM Holding £156, price £693, upside -77.5%, quality 65 out of 100. Calculated from audited financials with 26 valuation models and 37 quality factors, updated daily.
- Fair value above price? No
- Good quality? Yes
- Add to watchlist
LH
Broad data
Sep 24, 2026
LEM Holding
0QKB · LSEStretched ValuationStrong overvaluation with only moderate quality.
!Fair value £155.89 · Strongly overvalued (−77.5%)
✓Quality 65/100
!Weak Growth (revenue 5y −0.9 %/yr)
!Thin margins · 3.4% net margin (TTM)
✓generates free cash flow
!Narrow moat 41/100
What runs behind every stock
26
valuation models
8 families, DCF to NCAV
37
quality factors
margins, balance sheet, cashflow, debt
6
AI factors
moat, what no ratio measures
2,000+
data points
verified, per stock, median
69 individual criteria per stock, every one traceable See the method →
Price vs Fair Value
White line = price, green steps = our fair value per fiscal year, dashed = 300-day average. As of Sep 24, 2026.
How to read this chart
60‑month range £260.40 – £2,357 · fair‑value band £129.58 – £194.87 · the £693.00 price screens above the £155.89 fair value. Green steps = our fair value per fiscal year (point-in-time, no hindsight). Dashed = 300-day average. As of Sep 24, 2026.
Company profile
LEM Holding SA, together with its subsidiaries, provides measuring electrical parameters solutions in China, Japan, South Korea, India, Southeast Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, NAFTA, and Latin America.
Show more
LEM Holding SA, together with its subsidiaries, provides measuring electrical parameters solutions in China, Japan, South Korea, India, Southeast Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, NAFTA, and Latin America. The company offers current, voltage, integrated current, and Rogowski coil sensors, as well as energy meters; and provides after-sales and return merchandise authorization services. Its products are used in automotive battery management and motor control, electric vehicle chargers, smart grid, welding, automation, drives, high-precision, power supplies, renewable energies, trackside, and traction applications. The company was founded in 1972 and is headquartered in Meyrin, Switzerland.
Stock analysis
LEM Holding (0QKB) currently trades at £693.00, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is £155.89, 77.5% below the price, so the stock looks overvalued today.
Show more
Valuation
Bull case: the Dividend Discount group reads highest at a median of £401.07 per share, and 0 of the 24 models we run sit above the £693.00 price.
Bear case: the Asset-Based group reads lowest at £67.35, and 24 of the 24 models stay below the price. Evidence for this calculation is high.
Scenario range: £129.58 (bear) to £194.87 (bull), the price of £693.00 sits above it. Bear and bull are the same models on cautious and optimistic assumptions, a range, not a price target.
Quality & growth
The Quality Score stands at 65/100 (solid quality), in the Technology sector.
Weak Growth: Revenue is shrinking: the last year, the last three and the last five years are all negative.
LEM Holding reported revenue of £288M in FY2026 versus £373M in FY2022, a compound −6.3%/yr. Reported net income was £9.9M in FY2026, compounding −39.2%/yr from FY2022.
Key figures
Market cap £362M · P/E ratio 0.1 · EPS (TTM) £63.50 · Net margin 3.4% · Return on equity 7.6% · Return on assets (EBIT) 18.7% · Operating margin 9.2% · Revenue (TTM) £288M.
Competitive moat
Our AI-assisted moat analysis scores the competitive advantage at 48 out of 100 (low confidence).
What moves the price
The share trades at its 52-week high and 166% above its 52-week low, currently above its 200-day average.
For context, the median of 10 Technology peers we cover trades at −64% fair-value upside, at −78%, 0QKB screens richer than that median.
Fair Value models
Bear £129.58
Fair Value £155.89
Bull £194.87
Model ⓘEach model values the company its own way (discounted cash flow, earnings, assets, dividends). The fair value above is their evidence-weighted blend, not the output of a single model. Based on fiscal year 2026 figures (about 6 months old). Earnings retained since then (£32.36 per share) are deliberately not added.
Bear ⓘBear = the cautious scenario: the same model computed with conservative anchors (lower growth, margins and valuation multiples). Together with Bull it frames a plausible valuation range, not a price target.BaseBull ⓘBull = the optimistic scenario: the same model computed with favourable anchors (higher growth, margins and valuation multiples). Together with Bear it frames a plausible valuation range, not a price target. If a model's bull case is above four times its base value, the table shows that limit with a > sign (like the overall Bull above): beyond it no assumption holds.
Evidence ⓘEvidence = how well-backed THIS model's estimate is for this stock (0–100): how complete and reliable its input data are, and how well the model fits the company. The final Fair Value is an evidence-weighted blend, so better-evidenced models count more. Green ≥70, amber 50–69, grey below 50.
Highest evidence
FCF DCF
£251.38
£312.84
£419.04
80
Growth DCF
£257.15
£315.67
£408.88
77
Residual Income
£78.51
£81.98
£88.66
76
All 24 models by family
DCF Models
FCF DCF
£251.38
£312.84
£419.04
80
Owner Earnings
£197.59
£244.35
£325.16
75
5Y Revenue Exit
£215.88
£286.92
£389.85
71
5Y EBITDA Exit
£293.07
£418.34
£583.42
73
5Y P/E Exit
£179.93
£225.71
£280.87
69
10Y Revenue Exit
£225.59
£286.16
£353.87
66
10Y EBITDA Exit
£273.01
£365.51
£470.30
67
10Y P/E Exit
£209.41
£249.20
£288.32
63
Earnings-Based
Graham-Dodd
£49.99
£85.96
£105.10
67
EPV
£133.23
£147.79
£159.93
70
Dividend Discount
Gordon GGM
£329.89
£401.07
£469.31
69
DDM Multi-Stage
£329.89
£421.72
£521.21
67
Multiples
P/E Multiple
£115.78
£154.37
£192.96
63
P/S Multiple
£93.73
£124.97
£156.21
58
P/B Multiple
£93.73
£124.97
£156.21
55
EV/EBIT
£273.06
£355.28
£437.50
63
EV/EBITDA
£371.41
£486.41
£601.41
64
EV/Revenue
£202.45
£277.90
£353.34
51
Asset-Based
NCAV (Graham)
£50.26
£67.35
£100.52
51
Growth DCF
Growth DCF
£257.15
£315.67
£408.88
77
Rev-Margin DCF
£215.88
£291.73
£387.53
71
Economic Profit
Residual Income
£78.51
£81.98
£88.66
76
ROIC Compounder
£134.60
£151.61
£168.73
70
Growth Earnings
Growth-Adj P/E
£81.76
£116.79
£151.83
67
Notify me when 0QKB reaches fair value
Put 0QKB on your watchlist. We get in touch as soon as price and fair value meet or the trend turns.
Set up alert →Quality Score breakdown
Overall quality
65/100
Of which business quality 64 · Market factors (momentum, volatility) 71
Profitability
45
Margins and returns on capital today
Quality Growth
32
Are margins and returns improving?
Cashflow
71
Earnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
Fin. Strength
67
Balance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
Investment
99
Disciplined investing over empire-building
Low Volatility
39
Calm price path (market factor)
Momentum
83
Price trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
52W Momentum
89
Distance to the 52-week high (market factor)
Net Issuance
83
Share count: buybacks or dilution?
Revenue & earnings trend
Growth Quality ⓘGrowth is valuable only when reinvestment earns attractive returns (Aswath Damodaran): sustainable growth depends on return on capital, reinvestment and efficiency. Basis: total company revenue over the periods shown on the cards (3Y/5Y/all years), not per share, so a merger can show up as a growth jump; per-share earnings growth is in the value-creation card.
40/100
Revenue is shrinking: the last year, the last three and the last five years are all negative.
Revenue growth 1 year
−6.3%
Revenue growth 3 years ⓘMeasures the company's TOTAL revenue from reported annual statements: compound average growth per year (CAGR) from the fiscal year 3, 5 or N years back to the most recent comparable fiscal year. Not per share: buybacks do not change this number, and a merger can appear as a growth jump. Per-share growth (which does include buybacks) is in the value-creation card.
−10.9%
Revenue growth 5 years ⓘMeasures the company's TOTAL revenue from reported annual statements: compound average growth per year (CAGR) from the fiscal year 3, 5 or N years back to the most recent comparable fiscal year. Not per share: buybacks do not change this number, and a merger can appear as a growth jump. Per-share growth (which does include buybacks) is in the value-creation card.
−0.9%
Start year 2021 (pandemic). Over 10 years: +1.0% a year
Revenue growth 24 years ⓘMeasures the company's TOTAL revenue from reported annual statements: compound average growth per year (CAGR) from the fiscal year 3, 5 or N years back to the most recent comparable fiscal year. Not per share: buybacks do not change this number, and a merger can appear as a growth jump. Per-share growth (which does include buybacks) is in the value-creation card.
+2.6%
’15
’16
’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
’24
’25
’26
What shareholders gained per year (last 5 years) ⓘWhat the business itself delivers per year: earnings growth per share plus the dividend yield. This is what you get IF the market keeps valuing the stock the same way: it contains no assumption about the market changing its mind. Computed per share, so buybacks count and a merger does not pass as growth. For a company that pays no dividend it is pure earnings growth per share. Period: earnings growth per share as CAGR over the last 5 reported fiscal years (annual statements), plus the current dividend yield. The start value is the median of the three years around the start, so a single crisis year (a pandemic or a write-down) does not distort the rate.
−30.5%
Earnings growth per share plus dividend.
Earnings per share, growth per year−30.5%
Dividend (yield on the price)0.0%
Pace: 5 vs 10 years ⓘTwo data points, not a trend model: earnings growth per share over the last 5 fiscal years against the last 10. Labelled "steady" when both rates are within 3 percentage points of each other, otherwise picking up or flattening. Shown only when ten years of history exist.−30.5% vs −13.8%, slowing
Profit margin 2021 to 2026 ⓘOperating margin then vs now, from reported annual statements. A falling margin after a boom year is the classic peak-earnings signal: the growth rate then leans on an inflated base.20% → 9%
Start year 2021 (pandemic)
Growth Forecast
A lot of optimism in the price
The price assumes more growth than the company has delivered so far and more than analysts expect.
What the price assumes ⓘThis turns our valuation around: instead of asking what the share is worth, it asks what growth the current price requires. It uses the cash the company keeps after all spending (free cash flow), the same discount rate as our models, five years of growth, then slowing evenly to 2 % a year by year ten. Compared with the analysts' sales forecasts extended to the same five years (at least three analysts, for context only, it does not enter the Fair Value): within 3 percentage points counts as "in line" (amber), below that little optimism (green), above that a lot of optimism (red).
+17.1%
Yearly growth needed for the next five years to justify today's price.
What forecasts expect ⓘAnalysts publish sales forecasts for the next two fiscal years. For the years after that, growth slows evenly to 2 % a year by year ten (2 % is the long-run rate our models use). Projected years are marked as such.
+4.3%
Yearly sales growth analysts expect, extended to five years.
After inflation (UK: IMF forecast 2.3% a year to 2030, 3.3% from 2016 to 2025) that is about +14.4% a year for the price and +2.0% for the forecasts.
Forecast 2027 (sales)+1.8%
Forecast 2028 (sales)+5.7%
Projected 2029 (sales)+5.2%
Projected 2030 (sales)+4.7%
Projected 2031 (sales)+4.3%
0QKB screens overvalued: fair value 78% below the price. Compare with Amphenol Corporation →
Compare LEM Holding with another stock
Price, fair value, quality and upside side by side.
Free, no sign-up
Context: sector, industry, market
- P/E, EV/EBITDA and margins by industry (reference tables)
- Undervalued stocks: UK Stocks
- Valuation of the UK market
Values & ESG
Does this company touch areas you may want to avoid? The classification is inferred from sector and industry.
None of the checked exposures detected
Similar stocks
10 more Electronic Components stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate.
| Stock | Price | Fair Value | vs Fair Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amphenol Corporation APH | $84.30 | $84.44 | +0% |
| Delta Electronics, Inc 2308 | 1,910 TWD | 519.57 TWD | −73% |
| Corning Incorporated GLW | $153.76 | $33.52 | −78% |
| Hon Hai Precision Industry Co 2317 | 250.50 TWD | 293.60 TWD | +17% |
| Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co 009150 | 1,507,000 KRW | 171,572 KRW | −89% |
| TE Connectivity plc TEL | $218.59 | $142.45 | −35% |
| Luxshare Precision Industry Co 002475 | ¥52.00 | ¥18.59 | −64% |
| Elite Material Co 2383 | 5,050 TWD | 787.47 TWD | −84% |
| Shengyi Technology Co 600183 | ¥137.33 | ¥66.42 | −52% |
| Celestica Inc CLS | $373.09 | $106.95 | −71% |
Explore undervalued stocks
More undervalued Technology stocks →
All undervalued stocks
TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued High-Quality StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap StocksUndervalued Dividend Stocks
Try a ready-made strategy
Pick a strategy and jump into the live analysis with that exact screen applied.
🥇 Backtested Best
🏆 Big Names
⭐ Top Rated
💎 Quality on Sale
🚀 Profitable Growth
🧊 Quality Compounders
💵 Dividend Stars
📈 Strong Momentum
📉 Fallen Angels
⚖️ Deeply Undervalued
🔍 Small-Cap Gems
🏰 Moat at a Fair Price
💼 Insider Buying
🎩 Buffett-Style Quality
📚 Peter Lynch GARP
🧮 Greenblatt Magic Formula
🛡️ Graham Defensive
Discover tools
Stock screenerFilter by region, size and sector
Compare toolTwo stocks side by side
Extrinsic Value Calculator…Calculator with industry benchmark
Peter Lynch Fair Value Formula &…Calculator with industry benchmark
Run the numbers yourself: free valuation calculators
Frequently asked questions
Is LEM Holding (0QKB) overvalued or undervalued?
As of Sep 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of £155.89 versus a price of £693.00, about −78% upside (overvalued).
What is the fair value of 0QKB?
Our model-based fair value for LEM Holding is £155.89 (as of Sep 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price: £693.00.
What is the quality score of 0QKB?
LEM Holding has a Quality Score of 65/100. It measures business quality (profitability, growth, cash flow, balance-sheet strength, investment discipline, share issuance). Market factors such as price momentum and volatility do not enter the number; they are shown separately in the detail view.
What is the price target for LEM Holding (0QKB)?
Our model-based price target is the fair value of £155.89 (as of Sep 24, 2026) from 24 valuation models. Cautious scenario £129.58, optimistic scenario £194.87. It is a calculation from audited fundamentals, not an analyst target.
What is the LEM Holding stock forecast for 2026?
Our models put fair value at £155.89, about −78% upside versus a price of £693.00 (overvalued). Cautious scenario £129.58, optimistic scenario £194.87. The calculation is refreshed regularly with new filings.
What is the revenue of LEM Holding (0QKB)?
LEM Holding reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about £288M (latest available figure, as of Sep 24, 2026).
What growth is priced into LEM Holding (0QKB)?
For today's price to be fair in a discounted-cash-flow model, LEM Holding would have to grow free cash flow by +17.1 % per year for five years (discount rate 11.6 %, then slowing evenly to 2 % perpetual growth by year ten). Over the last 5 years revenue grew -0.9 % per year. As of Sep 24, 2026.
What discount rate (WACC) does the fair value of 0QKB use?
Our models discount LEM Holding at 11.6 %: a base by market capitalisation (small), damped by beta 0.94, country premium for United Kingdom. The same rate applies in all 26 models.
What is a reverse DCF?
A reverse DCF turns the usual calculation around. Instead of deriving a value from assumptions, it takes today's price as given and asks: what free-cash-flow growth would a company have to deliver for exactly this price to be fair? The result is not a forecast but the expectation already priced in. For LEM Holding that is +17.1 % per year a year over ten years, using the same discount rate (11.6 %) and the same formula as our fair value.
How much growth has LEM Holding (0QKB) delivered so far?
Over the past 5 years revenue at LEM Holding grew -0.9 % a year. The price currently implies +17.1 % per year free-cash-flow growth a year. Comparing the two shows how much confidence is in the price: if it demands more than has been delivered, the business has to accelerate for the maths to work.
How fast is the sector of LEM Holding (0QKB) growing?
The median revenue growth in the sector is +9.6 % a year. That is the yardstick for the growth priced into LEM Holding (+17.1 % per year a year): it shows whether the expectation is within the usual range or beyond it.
What is the free cash flow yield of LEM Holding (0QKB)?
The free-cash-flow yield on the price is 4.09 %: that much free cash flow LEM Holding produces per unit of market value. When it exceeds the discount rate of our models (11.6 %), the business already earns more than its cost of capital demands, and the price needs little additional growth.
What is the intrinsic value of LEM Holding (0QKB)?
Intrinsic value and fair value mean the same thing: what the business is worth on its numbers, independent of the share price. For LEM Holding it is £155.89 per share (as of Sep 24, 2026), against a price of £693.00. It is the blended result of 24 valuation models (cash flow, earnings, asset, dividend).
Is LEM Holding stock overvalued or undervalued in 2026?
As of Sep 24, 2026, 0QKB trades above its calculated fair value: price £693.00, fair value £155.89, a gap of about −78% (overvalued). The calculation is refreshed with each new quarterly report, so the verdict can change during the year.
Is fair value the same as the market price of 0QKB?
No. The price is what the market pays today (£693.00); the fair value is what the company's own numbers justify (£155.89). For LEM Holding the two are £537.11 per share apart. That gap is exactly why we show both numbers side by side.
How much is LEM Holding worth?
The market values LEM Holding at about £362M (market capitalisation, as of Sep 24, 2026). Per share that is £693.00; our models calculate a fair value of £155.89 per share.
What do the bullish and bearish scenarios say about 0QKB?
Our models span a range for LEM Holding: cautious scenario £129.58, base £155.89, optimistic £194.87 per share (as of Sep 24, 2026, price £693.00). The range comes from different growth and margin assumptions, not from analyst opinions.
How far is 0QKB from its 52-week high?
LEM Holding trades at £693.00, at its 52-week high of £693.00 and 166% above the low of £260.40 (as of Oct 2, 2026). Distance from the high says nothing about value: that is what the fair value of £155.89 is for.
Which stocks are comparable to LEM Holding?
From the same area (Technology) we also value Amphenol Corporation, Delta Electronics, Inc, Corning Incorporated, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, among others. Each of them has its own fair-value calculation on this site using the same models, so the comparison is like for like.
Is LEM Holding stock attractive at the current price?
The data as of Sep 24, 2026: price £693.00, calculated fair value £155.89 (−78%), Quality Score 65/100, from 24 models. Whether that fits your horizon and risk tolerance is your call. We provide the calculation, not investment advice.
How is the fair value of 0QKB calculated?
We run LEM Holding through 24 models from four families: discounted cash flow, earnings models, asset and balance-sheet models, and dividend models. Every model gets the same audited fundamentals; the result is the weighted average of £155.89, with the spread shown as a cautious and an optimistic scenario.
Is it still worth investing in stocks now?
The global stock market currently sits 14.5 % above its aggregate fair value. LEM Holding itself currently trades above fair value. An expensive market is no reason to stay out and no reason to buy everything at once: keep a broad savings plan running, buy single stocks only with money you can do without, and hold part of your money liquid while the market is high. The full picture including sectors is on is it worth investing now.
What is the share price of LEM Holding (0QKB)?
The closing price on Oct 2, 2026 was £693.00. Our model-based fair value is £155.89, about −78% upside (overvalued). We carry closing prices from our data provider, not a live tick.
What should I pay attention to with LEM Holding right now?
The price sits above even our optimistic bull case (£194.87). The favourable scenario is already priced in. Solid but not exceptional quality (65/100) and above fair value, neither a clear bargain nor a standout compounder.
Where does the earnings growth of LEM Holding (0QKB) come from?
Earnings per share at LEM Holding grew −4.9 % a year from 2015 to 2026. Broken into its drivers: revenue per share +2.7 %, EBIT margin −5.4 %, tax rate −0.1 %, residual (interest, one-offs) −2.0 %. The four rates multiply to the earnings growth rate, they do not add up. Start and end are three-year averages so a single exceptional year does not distort the result.
Key figures of LEM Holding
How large is the market capitalisation of LEM Holding (0QKB)?
The market capitalisation of LEM Holding is £362M. The stock-market value of the whole company: share price times number of shares. It is what the market asks for the entire business today.
What is the P/E ratio of LEM Holding (0QKB)?
The price-to-earnings ratio of LEM Holding is 0.1 (as of Jul 29, 2026). Price to earnings: how many years of current profit you pay for the stock. A P/E of 10 means ten years of profit.
What are the earnings per share of LEM Holding (0QKB)?
Earnings per share at LEM Holding are £63.50 (price ÷ EPS = P/E 0.1). Earnings per share over the last twelve months: total profit spread across every single share.
What is the net margin of LEM Holding (0QKB)?
The net margin of LEM Holding is 3.4% (fiscal year 2026). How much of every unit of revenue ends up as profit. 10% means 10 cents of profit per dollar of sales.
What is the return on equity of LEM Holding (0QKB)?
The return on equity (ROE) of LEM Holding is 7.6% (last twelve months). Profit relative to shareholders' equity, how efficiently the company works with its owners' money.
What is the EBIT return on assets of LEM Holding (0QKB)?
On an EBIT basis the return on assets of LEM Holding is 18.7% (avg 5y). Operating profit (EBIT) relative to everything the company owns, as a multi-year average. It describes the business model rather than one good or bad year.
What is the operating margin of LEM Holding (0QKB)?
The operating margin of LEM Holding is 9.2% (last twelve months). Profit from the core business (before interest and taxes) relative to revenue.
How fast is revenue growing at LEM Holding (0QKB)?
Revenue at LEM Holding is growing −8.9% versus a year earlier (3y avg −10.9%). How much revenue grew versus a year earlier (YoY). The 3-year average next to it puts the single year in context.
How fast are earnings growing at LEM Holding (0QKB)?
Earnings per share at LEM Holding are growing +26.4% versus a year earlier. How much earnings per share grew versus a year earlier.
How much net debt does LEM Holding (0QKB) carry?
The net debt of LEM Holding is £90.0M (fiscal year 2026, ≈ 2.8 yrs of FCF). Debt minus cash on hand. The note shows how many years of free cash flow could in theory pay it off.
Free · no account needed
Continue in the live analysis
Fair value and trend for 35,000+ stocks, watchlist, comparison and the diversification check. You can also try 14 days of Pro there, no card.
Open the live analysis →Zero risk: nothing is ever charged. Your watchlist is yours, with or without an account.