Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1499 (1499) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$596M

1 1499 1499 · HK
PriceHK$0.1150
Fair ValueHK$0.0700
Upside-39.1%
Quality43/100
Watch 1499 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Low Range HK$0.0500 – HK$0.0900

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 7 valuation models · updated today

Share price −14.1% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.7109 HK$0.1119 Fair Value HK$0.0700 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.1119 – HK$0.7109 · fair‑value band HK$0.0500 – HK$0.0900 · the HK$0.1150 price screens above the HK$0.0700 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1499 (1499) currently trades at HK$0.1150, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0700 — implying the stock looks roughly 39.1% overvalued today. We read business quality at 43/100 (below-average quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1499 generated revenue of HK$341M at a net margin of -3.4%. Revenue declined 42.5% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -8.0%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$26.9M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$341M
Revenue growth (YoY) -42.5%
Net margin -3.4%
Return on equity -8.0%
Free cash flow HK$95.1M FY2025
Operating margin -2.9%
More key figures
Net cash HK$26.9M FY2026

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2022 – FY2026 · reported fiscal years

1499 reported revenue of HK$192M in FY2026 versus HK$386M in FY2022, a compound −16.0%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$28.8M in FY2026.

Revenue −16.0%/yr
FY22 HK$386M
FY23 HK$356M
FY24 HK$337M
FY25 HK$424M
FY26 HK$192M
Net income
FY22 −HK$58.1M
FY23 HK$43.5M
FY24 −HK$40.3M
FY25 −HK$15.8M
FY26 −HK$28.8M

Is 1499 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD $0.4110 $0.0100 -98%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260 520,000 KRW 268,469 KRW -48%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668 ¥4.65 ¥17.35 +273%
TopBuild Corp BLD 7,547 MXN 324.01 MXN -96%
000720 000720 130,300 KRW 55,602 KRW -57%
United Integrated Services Co 2404 1,205 TWD 1,891 TWD +57%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1499 (1499) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0700 versus a price of HK$0.1150 — about −39% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1499?
Our model-based fair value for 1499 is HK$0.0700 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1150.
What is the quality score of 1499?
1499 has a Quality Score of 43/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1499 (1499)?
1499 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$341M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1499?
The net profit margin of 1499 is about -3.4%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.