Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1741 (1741) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$152M

1 1741 1741 · HK
PriceHK$0.1900
Fair ValueHK$0.0300
Upside-84.2%
Quality59/100
Watch 1741 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Low Range HK$0.0200 – HK$0.0300

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 1 valuation models · updated today

Share price −23.7% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.4000 HK$0.1040 Fair Value HK$0.0300 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.1040 – HK$0.4000 · fair‑value band HK$0.0200 – HK$0.0300 · the HK$0.1900 price screens above the HK$0.0300 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1741 (1741) currently trades at HK$0.1900, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0300 — implying the stock looks roughly 84.2% overvalued today. We read business quality at 59/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1741 generated revenue of HK$144M at a net margin of -8.8%. Revenue declined 10.3% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -59.2%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$18.8M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$144M
Revenue growth (YoY) -10.3%
Net margin -8.8%
Return on equity -59.2%
Free cash flow −HK$7.6M FY2025
Operating margin -10.0%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0100
Net cash HK$18.8M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1741 reported revenue of HK$152M in FY2025 versus HK$223M in FY2021, a compound −9.1%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$12.0M in FY2025.

Revenue −9.1%/yr
FY21 HK$223M
FY22 HK$110M
FY23 HK$177M
FY24 HK$144M
FY25 HK$152M
Net income
FY21 −HK$21.3M
FY22 −HK$136M
FY23 −HK$1.8M
FY24 −HK$10.1M
FY25 −HK$12.0M

Is 1741 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD $42.70 $34.33 -20%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260 460,500 KRW 206,212 KRW -55%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668 ¥4.72 ¥16.90 +258%
TopBuild Corp BLD 7,547 MXN 5,931 MXN -21%
000720 000720 131,900 KRW 76,878 KRW -42%
United Integrated Services Co 2404 1,260 TWD 1,431 TWD +14%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1741 (1741) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0300 versus a price of HK$0.1900 — about −84% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1741?
Our model-based fair value for 1741 is HK$0.0300 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1900.
What is the quality score of 1741?
1741 has a Quality Score of 59/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1741 (1741)?
1741 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$144M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1741?
The net profit margin of 1741 is about -8.8%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.