1953 (1953) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$1.4B

1 1953 1953 · HK

PriceHK$1.10

Fair ValueHK$0.1300

Upside-88.2%

Quality66/100

Watch 1953 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Medium Range HK$0.1100 – HK$0.1500

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 8 valuation models · updated today

Share price −17.9% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.0620 – HK$1.77 · fair‑value band HK$0.1100 – HK$0.1500 · the HK$1.10 price screens above the HK$0.1300 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1953 (1953) currently trades at HK$1.10, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.1300 — implying the stock looks roughly 88.2% overvalued today. We read business quality at 66/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1953 generated revenue of HK$321M at a net margin of 3.5%. Revenue grew 50.6% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 8.0%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$60.1M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$321M

Revenue growth (YoY) +50.6%

Net margin 3.5%

Return on equity 8.0%

Free cash flow −HK$3.9M FY2025

P/E ratio 55.0

More key figures

Operating margin 9.5%

Dividend yield 1.3%

EPS growth (YoY) +398%

Net cash HK$60.1M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1953 reported revenue of HK$252M in FY2025 versus HK$282M in FY2021, a compound −2.8%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$1.4M in FY2025.

Revenue −2.8%/yr

FY21 HK$282M

FY22 HK$476M

FY23 HK$510M

FY24 HK$289M

FY25 HK$252M

Net income

FY21 HK$12.8M

FY22 HK$233K

FY23 HK$20.0M

FY24 −HK$1.6M

FY25 −HK$1.4M

Is 1953 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD	$0.4110	$0.0100	-98%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260	407,500 KRW	236,704 KRW	-42%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668	¥4.74	¥15.02	+217%
TopBuild Corp BLD	7,547 MXN	3,472 MXN	-54%
000720 000720	131,900 KRW	76,878 KRW	-42%
United Integrated Services Co 2404	1,260 TWD	1,431 TWD	+14%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1953 (1953) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.1300 versus a price of HK$1.10 — about −88% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1953?

Our model-based fair value for 1953 is HK$0.1300 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$1.10.

What is the quality score of 1953?

1953 has a Quality Score of 66/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1953 (1953)?

1953 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$321M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1953?

The net profit margin of 1953 is about 3.5%, meaning it keeps roughly 3.5% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 1953 pay a dividend?

1953 currently shows a dividend yield of about 1.25% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.