1958 (1958) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$6.5B

1 1958 1958 · HK

PriceHK$0.8000

Fair ValueHK$0.5700

Upside-28.8%

Quality45/100

Watch 1958 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Medium Range HK$0.2900 – HK$0.7900

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated today

Share price −35.0% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.7800 – HK$2.37 · fair‑value band HK$0.2900 – HK$0.7900 · the HK$0.8000 price screens above the HK$0.5700 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1958 (1958) currently trades at HK$0.8000, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.5700 — implying the stock looks roughly 28.8% overvalued today. We read business quality at 45/100 (below-average quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1958 generated revenue of HK$153B at a net margin of -1.1%. Revenue declined 26.0% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 3.4%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$6.0B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$153B

Revenue growth (YoY) -26.0%

Net margin -1.1%

Return on equity 3.4%

Free cash flow HK$906M FY2025

P/E ratio 40.5

More key figures

Operating margin 2.2%

EPS (TTM) HK$-0.1100

EPS growth (YoY) -10.2%

Net cash HK$6.0B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1958 reported revenue of HK$164B in FY2025 versus HK$176B in FY2021, a compound −1.7%/yr. Reported net income was HK$123M in FY2025, compounding −57.8%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −1.7%/yr

FY21 HK$176B

FY22 HK$190B

FY23 HK$198B

FY24 HK$192B

FY25 HK$164B

Net income −57.8%/yr

FY21 HK$3.9B

FY22 HK$4.2B

FY23 HK$3.0B

FY24 HK$956M

FY25 HK$123M

Is 1958 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Auto Manufacturers stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Mahindra & Mahindra Limited MHID	$31.10	$36.77	+18%
Toyota Motor Corporation TM	$177.16	$230.51	+30%
VOW3 VOW3	€87.66	€93.91	+7%
81211 81211	HK$67.90	HK$42.60	-37%
BYD Company 002594	¥90.31	¥39.98	-56%
Tesla, Inc TSLA	39,580 ARS	22,068 ARS	-44%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1958 (1958) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.5700 versus a price of HK$0.8000 — about −29% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1958?

Our model-based fair value for 1958 is HK$0.5700 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.8000.

What is the quality score of 1958?

1958 has a Quality Score of 45/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1958 (1958)?

1958 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$153B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1958?

The net profit margin of 1958 is about -1.1%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.