1962 (1962) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Defensive · Market cap HK$287M

1 1962 1962 · HK

PriceHK$0.4600

Fair ValueHK$1.03

Upside+123.9%

Quality63/100

Watch 1962 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.7800 – HK$1.29

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 25 valuation models · updated today

Share price +2.2% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.3761 – HK$0.5505 · fair‑value band HK$0.7800 – HK$1.29 · the HK$0.4600 price screens below the HK$1.03 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1962 (1962) currently trades at HK$0.4600, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$1.03 — implying the stock looks roughly 123.9% undervalued today. We read business quality at 63/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Defensive sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1962 generated revenue of HK$1.0B at a net margin of 2.9%. Revenue grew 17.8% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 3.9%. Net debt stands at HK$445M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$1.0B

Revenue growth (YoY) +17.8%

Net margin 2.9%

Return on equity 3.9%

Free cash flow HK$295M FY2025

P/E ratio 9.2

More key figures

Operating margin 7.1%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0200

Dividend yield 10.3%

EPS growth (YoY) +3.1%

Net debt HK$445M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1962 reported revenue of HK$1.0B in FY2025 versus HK$1.2B in FY2021, a compound −3.6%/yr. Reported net income was HK$30.7M in FY2025, compounding −13.2%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −3.6%/yr

FY21 HK$1.2B

FY22 HK$1.1B

FY23 HK$979M

FY24 HK$1.0B

FY25 HK$1.0B

Net income −13.2%/yr

FY21 HK$54.1M

FY22 HK$66.3M

FY23 HK$51.0M

FY24 HK$39.9M

FY25 HK$30.7M

Is 1962 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Household & Personal Products stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
PG PG	2,590 MXN	108.66 MXN	-96%
The Procter & Gamble Company PGCO34	R$54.71	R$7.69	-86%
L'Oréal S.A LRLCF	$445.77	$275.67	-38%
Unilever PLC UNLYF	$59.34	$46.11	-22%
Colgate-Palmolive Company CPA	€77.60	€36.69	-53%
Hindustan Unilever Limited HINDUNILVR	₹2,170	₹807.38	-63%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Defensive stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1962 (1962) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$1.03 versus a price of HK$0.4600 — about +124% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1962?

Our model-based fair value for 1962 is HK$1.03 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.4600.

What is the quality score of 1962?

1962 has a Quality Score of 63/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1962 (1962)?

1962 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$1.0B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1962?

The net profit margin of 1962 is about 2.9%, meaning it keeps roughly 2.9% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 1962 pay a dividend?

1962 currently shows a dividend yield of about 10.33% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.