1967 (1967) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · Market cap HK$90.0M

1 1967 1967 · HK

PriceHK$0.3000

Fair ValueHK$0.3000

Upside+0.0%

Quality41/100

Watch 1967 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.2500 – HK$0.3700

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 15 valuation models · updated today

Share price −20.0% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.2900 – HK$0.6200 · fair‑value band HK$0.2500 – HK$0.3700 · the HK$0.3000 price screens below the HK$0.3000 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1967 (1967) currently trades at HK$0.3000, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.3000 — implying the stock looks roughly 0.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 41/100 (below-average quality), in the Technology sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1967 generated revenue of HK$267M at a net margin of 1.5%. Revenue grew 2.7% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 1.9%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$61.1M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$267M

Revenue growth (YoY) +2.7%

Net margin 1.5%

Return on equity 1.9%

Free cash flow −HK$4.0M FY2025

P/E ratio 15.0

More key figures

Operating margin 0.5%

EPS growth (YoY) -89.3%

Net cash HK$61.1M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1967 reported revenue of HK$267M in FY2025 versus HK$354M in FY2021, a compound −6.8%/yr. Reported net income was HK$3.9M in FY2025, compounding −14.4%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −6.8%/yr

FY21 HK$354M

FY22 HK$261M

FY23 HK$264M

FY24 HK$289M

FY25 HK$267M

Net income −14.4%/yr

FY21 HK$7.2M

FY22 −HK$9.1M

FY23 −HK$23.8M

FY24 HK$1.6M

FY25 HK$3.9M

Is 1967 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Electronic Components stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co HHPD	$0.1662	$0.0100	-94%
Delta Electronics, Inc 2308	2,080 TWD	420.52 TWD	-80%
Amphenol Corporation APH	$165.96	$69.46	-58%
Corning Incorporated GLW	$209.83	$27.12	-87%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co 009150	1,000,000 KRW	165,455 KRW	-83%
Luxshare Precision Industry Co 002475	¥68.40	¥21.32	-69%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Technology stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1967 (1967) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.3000 versus a price of HK$0.3000 — about +0% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1967?

Our model-based fair value for 1967 is HK$0.3000 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.3000.

What is the quality score of 1967?

1967 has a Quality Score of 41/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1967 (1967)?

1967 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$267M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1967?

The net profit margin of 1967 is about 1.5%, meaning it keeps roughly 1.5% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.