Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1968 (1968) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$111M

1 1968 1968 · HK
PriceHK$0.1700
Fair ValueHK$0.1100
Upside-35.3%
Quality56/100
Watch 1968 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Low Range HK$0.0700 – HK$0.1400

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 1 valuation models · updated today

Share price −1.2% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.2300 HK$0.1000 Fair Value HK$0.1100 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.1000 – HK$0.2300 · fair‑value band HK$0.0700 – HK$0.1400 · the HK$0.1700 price screens above the HK$0.1100 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1968 (1968) currently trades at HK$0.1700, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.1100 — implying the stock looks roughly 35.3% overvalued today. We read business quality at 56/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1968 generated revenue of HK$221M at a net margin of -14.2%. Revenue grew 8.0% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -13.9%. Net debt stands at HK$4.9M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$221M
Revenue growth (YoY) +8.0%
Net margin -14.2%
Return on equity -13.9%
Free cash flow −HK$13.4M FY2025
Operating margin -15.7%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0200
EPS growth (YoY) -82.3%
Net debt HK$4.9M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1968 reported revenue of HK$221M in FY2025 versus HK$363M in FY2021, a compound −11.7%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$31.3M in FY2025.

Revenue −11.7%/yr
FY21 HK$363M
FY22 HK$245M
FY23 HK$163M
FY24 HK$215M
FY25 HK$221M
Net income
FY21 −HK$11.9M
FY22 −HK$50.0M
FY23 −HK$37.8M
FY24 −HK$35.0M
FY25 −HK$31.3M

Is 1968 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Textile Manufacturing stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Toray Industries, Inc TRYIF $7.90 $6.29 -20%
Shenzhou International Group SZHIF $6.78 $9.47 +40%
Tongkun Group 601233 ¥23.09 ¥14.53 -37%
HMT (Xiamen) New Technical Materials Co 603306 ¥105.04 ¥9.03 -91%
Far Eastern New Century Corporation 1402 27.40 TWD 39.06 TWD +43%
KPRMILL KPRMILL ₹1,181 ₹467.49 -60%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1968 (1968) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.1100 versus a price of HK$0.1700 — about −35% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1968?
Our model-based fair value for 1968 is HK$0.1100 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1700.
What is the quality score of 1968?
1968 has a Quality Score of 56/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1968 (1968)?
1968 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$221M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1968?
The net profit margin of 1968 is about -14.2%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.