1975 (1975) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$187M

1 1975 1975 · HK

PriceHK$0.4000

Fair ValueHK$1.03

Upside+157.5%

Quality53/100

Watch 1975 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Low Range HK$0.8600 – HK$1.19

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 4 valuation models · updated today

Share price −2.4% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.2946 – HK$0.4650 · fair‑value band HK$0.8600 – HK$1.19 · the HK$0.4000 price screens below the HK$1.03 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1975 (1975) currently trades at HK$0.4000, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$1.03 — implying the stock looks roughly 157.5% undervalued today. We read business quality at 53/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1975 generated revenue of HK$242M at a net margin of -35.2%. Revenue grew 22.2% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -20.6%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$182M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$242M

Revenue growth (YoY) +22.2%

Net margin -35.2%

Return on equity -20.6%

Free cash flow −HK$15.2M FY2025

Operating margin 3.6%

More key figures

EPS (TTM) HK$-0.3800

Dividend yield 9.4%

EPS growth (YoY) +119%

Net cash HK$182M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1975 reported revenue of HK$218M in FY2025 versus HK$380M in FY2021, a compound −12.9%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$88.6M in FY2025.

Revenue −12.9%/yr

FY21 HK$380M

FY22 HK$658M

FY23 HK$534M

FY24 HK$296M

FY25 HK$218M

Net income

FY21 HK$77.8M

FY22 HK$116M

FY23 HK$77.5M

FY24 HK$17.1M

FY25 −HK$88.6M

Is 1975 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Specialty Business Services stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Cintas Corporation CTAS	$169.45	$82.75	-51%
RELX PLC R1EL34	R$45.28	R$23.22	-49%
Thomson Reuters Corporation TRI	C$108.50	C$70.40	-35%
Copart, Inc CPRT	$30.77	$28.89	-6%
Global Payments Inc GPN	$65.09	$70.80	+9%
UL Solutions Inc ULS	$89.71	$30.99	-65%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1975 (1975) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$1.03 versus a price of HK$0.4000 — about +158% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1975?

Our model-based fair value for 1975 is HK$1.03 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.4000.

What is the quality score of 1975?

1975 has a Quality Score of 53/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1975 (1975)?

1975 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$242M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1975?

The net profit margin of 1975 is about -35.2%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 1975 pay a dividend?

1975 currently shows a dividend yield of about 9.38% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.