1982 (1982) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$1.8B

1 1982 1982 · HK

PriceHK$0.7900

Fair ValueHK$2.00

Upside+153.2%

Quality51/100

Watch 1982 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Medium Range HK$1.11 – HK$2.80

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 16 valuation models · updated today

Share price −13.2% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.6755 – HK$1.19 · fair‑value band HK$1.11 – HK$2.80 · the HK$0.7900 price screens below the HK$2.00 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1982 (1982) currently trades at HK$0.7900, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$2.00 — implying the stock looks roughly 153.2% undervalued today. We read business quality at 51/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: medium) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1982 generated revenue of HK$4.6B at a net margin of 6.5%. Revenue grew 14.5% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 11.3%. Net debt stands at HK$797M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$4.6B

Revenue growth (YoY) +14.5%

Net margin 6.5%

Return on equity 11.3%

Free cash flow −HK$32.6M FY2025

P/E ratio 6.2

More key figures

Operating margin -3.0%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.1700

Dividend yield 13.9%

EPS growth (YoY) +12.7%

Net debt HK$797M FY2026

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2022 – FY2026 · reported fiscal years

1982 reported revenue of HK$4.6B in FY2026 versus HK$4.0B in FY2022, a compound +3.4%/yr. Reported net income was HK$301M in FY2026, compounding +3.4%/yr from FY2022.

Revenue +3.4%/yr

FY22 HK$4.0B

FY23 HK$4.6B

FY24 HK$4.4B

FY25 HK$4.4B

FY26 HK$4.6B

Net income +3.4%/yr

FY22 HK$263M

FY23 HK$135M

FY24 HK$362M

FY25 HK$342M

FY26 HK$301M

Is 1982 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Apparel Manufacturing stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB HMB	kr 165.70	kr 144.10	-13%
Ralph Lauren Corporation RL	$366.55	$365.78	-0%
Moncler S.p.A MONC	€53.84	€38.28	-29%
Gildan Activewear Inc GIL	$52.09	$33.02	-37%
LPP SA LPP	21,880 PLN	18,197 PLN	-17%
Levi Strauss & Co LEVI	$23.37	$16.66	-29%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1982 (1982) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$2.00 versus a price of HK$0.7900 — about +153% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1982?

Our model-based fair value for 1982 is HK$2.00 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.7900.

What is the quality score of 1982?

1982 has a Quality Score of 51/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1982 (1982)?

1982 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$4.6B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1982?

The net profit margin of 1982 is about 6.5%, meaning it keeps roughly 6.5% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 1982 pay a dividend?

1982 currently shows a dividend yield of about 13.92% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.