Giantplus Technology Co (8105) Fair Value & Analysis
Technology · TW · Market cap 9.9B TWD
Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026
Analysis
Giantplus Technology Co (8105) currently trades at 23.50 TWD, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is 12.47 TWD — implying the stock looks roughly 46.9% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Technology sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).
About the company
Giantplus Technology Co., Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the research, development, production, and sale of liquid crystal displays in Taiwan, China, Hong Kong, Macau, Europe, Japan, the United States, and internationally. It offers TFT-LCD displays, such as point of sale (POS), printers, wearable, handy terminal, electronic shelf label, home appliance, medical devices, and GPSMap used in marine, printer, construction machinery, electronic shelf labels, home appliance, digital image, low power devices, medical devices, HMI monitor, handheld terminal, measuring devices, POS terminal, navigation devices, voice over internet protocol products, and automotive interior display products. The company was founded in 1986 and is headquartered in Toufen City, Taiwan.
Open the full interactive analysis →
Similar stocks
Frequently asked questions
Is Giantplus Technology Co (8105) undervalued?
What is the fair value of 8105?
What is the quality score of 8105?
How we calculate Fair Value
Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.
Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.