Macarthur Minerals Limited (MIO) Fair Value & Analysis
Basic Materials · AU · Market cap A$9.0M
Fair value as of: Jul 12, 2026
From 1 valuation models · updated today
Share price −4.0% over the past month.
Price vs Fair Value (12 months)
12‑month range A$0.0150 – A$0.0790 · fair‑value band A$0.0298 – A$0.0441 · the A$0.0240 price screens below the A$0.0339 fair value. As of Jul 12, 2026.
✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →Analysis
Macarthur Minerals Limited (MIO) currently trades at A$0.0240, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.0339 — implying the stock looks roughly 41.1% undervalued today. We read business quality at 29/100 (below-average quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.
Revenue declined 84.8% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -4.6%. Fundamentals as of Jul 12, 2026
Our scenario range runs from A$0.0298 (bear case) to A$0.0441 (bull case); at A$0.0240, the current price sits below that range. The share trades about 71% below its 52-week high and 85% above its 52-week low, currently below its 200-day average. For context, the median of 10 Basic Materials peers we cover trades at -36% fair-value upside — at 41%, MIO screens cheaper than that median.
Key figures & financial health
More key figures
Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 12, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.
About the company
Macarthur Minerals Limited, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the exploration and evaluation of mineral resource properties in Australia and the United States. It explores for gold, lithium, iron ore, and nickel projects. The company was formerly known as Macarthur Diamonds Limited and changed its name to Macarthur Minerals Limited in July 2005. Macarthur Minerals Limited was incorporated in 2002 and is headquartered in Brisbane, Australia.
Revenue & earnings trend
FY2020 – FY2026 · reported fiscal years
Macarthur Minerals Limited reported revenue of A$0 in FY2024 versus A$0 in FY2020. Reported net income was −A$1.8M in FY2026.
Is MIO fairly valued? → Check now
Similar stocks
10 more Other Industrial Metals & Mining stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 12, 2026).
| Stock | Price | Fair Value | vs Fair Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHP Group BHP | $82.95 | $47.52 | -43% |
| Rio Tinto Group RTNTF | $120.75 | $77.09 | -36% |
| Grupo México, S.A. GMBXF | $12.66 | $9.58 | -24% |
| CMOC Group CMCLY | $148.88 | $119.76 | -20% |
| Vale S.A VALEN | 260.19 MXN | 9.30 MXN | -96% |
| Anglo American plc AAUKF | $51.51 | $20.30 | -61% |
| Fortescue Ltd FSUMF | $13.50 | $15.72 | +16% |
| Teck Resources Limited TCKRF | $59.71 | $30.48 | -49% |
| China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co 600111 | ¥54.15 | ¥6.74 | -88% |
| Hindustan Zinc Limited HINDZINC | ₹573.20 | ₹649.37 | +13% |
Explore undervalued stocks
More undervalued Basic Materials stocks →
Frequently asked questions
Is Macarthur Minerals Limited (MIO) undervalued?
What is the fair value of MIO?
What is the quality score of MIO?
What is the net profit margin of MIO?
How we calculate Fair Value
Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.
Unlock the full Macarthur Minerals Limited analysis — and try Pro free
One email gets you 14 days of full Pro (review alerts, the 35,000+ stock screener, the diversification check) plus the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks. No card, cancel anytime.
Zero risk: nothing is ever charged. After 14 days you decide whether to stay.
Not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.